Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27
What possible harm could a tiny little "controlled burn" do?


3 posted on 07/12/2023 12:07:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Actually, out of the 3 options that they had, burning it was the best one..


7 posted on 07/12/2023 12:57:05 PM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO! The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
What you are seeing is not a so-called controlled burn. The video clip shows several explosions due to tank ruptures caused by impact and/or high temperatures and pressures and the resulting conflagration that followed.

I saw one plume maybe two that may of been a discharge from a pressure relief valve operating as designed or a sheered off valve, which is distinct possibility.

There was nothing controlled.

At that point in the disaster timeline, it was suicide for any first responder to get within 100 yards of the fire. Initially, the responders when the fire had burned out a lot, would have been focused first on containment insofar as possible and cooling the fire via hoses from the responding fire engines.

By the way…. You still reading that rag Chemical Violence? Lol…

13 posted on 07/12/2023 4:45:56 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson