Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2023 9:16:21 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Liberals don’t experience embarrassment.


2 posted on 07/06/2023 9:19:09 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Math expertise is acting white.


3 posted on 07/06/2023 9:20:04 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“I’m not a mathematician.”


6 posted on 07/06/2023 9:26:18 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

KBJ is a glaring error.


8 posted on 07/06/2023 9:27:19 PM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Stop picking on retards. I’ll bet this subhuman skank would misspell that mishmash of a name 6 out of 5 times.

K EN TAJ E.


9 posted on 07/06/2023 9:44:46 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Instead, in its most fully specified model, it [the study] reports that 99.6839% of black babies born with a black attending physician survived compared with 99.5549% of black babies born with white attending physicians, a difference of 0.129%.

100% - 99.6839% = 0.3161%.

100% - 99.5549% = 0.4451%.

Meaning: When a Black physician is in attendance, only 0.3161% die.

And when a White physician is in attendance, 0.4451% die.

0.4451% divided by 0.3161% = approx. 1.41.

Meaning: The death rate with a White physician is about 41% higher.

HOWEVER, we are talking about a comparison of two tiny slivers of data-sets.

I would hazard the claim that:

a. This is in the range of uncertainty and/or the data-sets are too small to be statistically significant, or

b. A multi-variant analysis taking into consideration ALL factors would cause the difference to vanish.

FURTHER: What, no Asian or Latino attending physicians?! Don't they exist?!

Regards,

12 posted on 07/06/2023 10:25:49 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

BTTT


13 posted on 07/06/2023 10:37:08 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought the Pulse shooter was gay?


15 posted on 07/07/2023 1:08:06 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“...everyone makes mistakes...”

“Facts” appearing in written decisional or dissenting opinions on appeal need not stick out like sore thumbs, or prove to be sources of controversy, if the authors of those opinion exercise ordinary levels of judicial restraint characteristic of the traditional conservative approach toward this kind of work. Among the tried and true safeguards that come in handy here is the uncontroversial advice to avoid like the plague taking so-called “judicial notice” of facts not present in the formal record of the case at trial, such that only “tried and true” facts, formally found as such by the original judge during the course of a trial on the merits, are found in the downstream appellate opinions.


16 posted on 07/07/2023 2:27:46 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Cut her some slack, it’s not like she actually earned her gig.


17 posted on 07/07/2023 3:27:32 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Glaring error, no, deliberate predictable and coming from a DEI AFFIRMATIVE ACTION example HERSELF


18 posted on 07/07/2023 3:34:17 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

She wasn’t picked for her intellect.


19 posted on 07/07/2023 5:00:57 AM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

3% of the American populus is Asian heritage. Yet, 19 percent of Harvard admissions is Asians and it is estimated that if admissions were based solely on academic merit, 41% of admissions would be Asians. That is the way it should be in a true constitutional color blind merit based society. The US populus is over 60% white. Yet, only 43% of Harvard students are white. I had to chuckle at the brief by the Asian plaintiff in the Harvard case. Part of it boiled down to if you are going to discriminate in favor of black and brown preference, we have no objection so long as you take if from the white tribe not the Asian tribe. With friends like these to throw your tribe under the bus, who needs enemies! lol


22 posted on 07/07/2023 5:11:00 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

These liberal dissents are weak in legal substance and are essentially political advocacy statements.


25 posted on 07/07/2023 5:41:45 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

She is a very stupid woman. Worse is she believes she is brilliant. Sotomayor is another moron but not quite as stupid as Brown. Kagen, unfortunately, is smart but a ruthless marxist and the most dangerous one of the feminazi brigade.


31 posted on 07/07/2023 9:07:21 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson