“AI, as far as I see it, doesn’t necessarily replace humans, but rather enhances the work of humans,” Wang said. “I think that the kind of competition that we all should be thinking more about is that human specialists will be replaced by human specialists who can take advantage of AI tools.”
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Let’s be clear. It enhances the work of the last human that works. Everybody else gets nothing from the deal.
2 posted on
07/04/2023 6:24:34 AM PDT by
Jonty30
(If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
To: Diana in Wisconsin
3 posted on
07/04/2023 6:52:03 AM PDT by
sauropod
(“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
I see it, doesn’t necessarily replace humans
Agree it lets the thinking class of people to maintain their jobs.
4 posted on
07/04/2023 7:31:40 AM PDT by
Vaduz
(....)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
It can tighten up code. Been using GTP-4 for that.
6 posted on
07/04/2023 7:40:36 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
IBM CEO Arvind Krishna Does he actually have a plan?
Statement 1: We are pausing hiring due to AI.
Statement 2: AI will create more jobs.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
You ain’t seen nuttin yet. Just wait till the present AI Software starts writing it’s own AI Software.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson