[devane617]

"The Supreme Court be damned."

This is about to become the norm for the Left. The mask and gloves are off. The Constitution has been tossed out the window. This AG will openly defy the SCOTUS and NO ONE can or will stop her.

[bobbo666]

SCOTUS has the authority to shut down every Fed court in the state. Imagine the backlog in just weeks.

[ActresponsiblyinVA]

Does she expect residents to comply with Arizona laws?

[Chewbarkah]

Let’s say the Ariz AG prosecutes someone for not following a law the US Supreme Court has just nixed. The defense will file a pre-trial motion to dismiss, citing the Supreme Court decision, and asking for legal costs and sanctions against the AG for willful prosecutorial misconduct. Unless the AG has shopped for a leftist judge, that will be the end of it. Otherwise it will be appealed, then dismissed.

The AG is making noise for her leftist base. Unless she wants to signal her virtue by going down in flames, talk is all she’ll do.

[Eleutheria5]

We’ll see.

[newzjunkey]

The case was pretty narrow. Colorado agreed it would enforce the law as the Christian web designer said they would in her lawsuit. The ruling simply says the government cannot compel speech. No American should see this as problematic. The Left loves to say a school can’t require the pledge of allegiance but they are saying, backed by the coercive power of the state, a client can force speech and creativity as if she’s their damned slave.

They would be free to use a generic template wedding website kit provided by her but demanding she use her talents to create something custom against her faith is a NO. Americans are a free people with unalienable rights.

The Left is flexing its fascist impulses trying to control thoughts and behaviors more overtly than ever. They don’t want to win over people, win hearts and minds. It’s what Rush called “unity through fascism” and it’s alive and thriving like a metastatic cancer.

Despite the Left’s talking point, this isn’t discrimination against LGB. It’s not aimed at that community. They use this lie to stir outrage and score political points. In this case you aren’t denying service based on who they are, you are asserting your independence and individual rights over your mind and body. I think if the case were honestly described in leftist friendly terms, there would be no controversy.

Dems are saying the court acted improperly taking this case since no actual LGBT were denied a wedding website and she wasn’t held accountable by Colorado but Colorado agreed it would enforce their law as she claimed. They are also claiming she only got into the business of website design to have this case. I would be shocked if this happened; the Left has never provoked a case, not even Rosa Parks. /s

[kiryandil]

Stolen “elections” have consequences.

[lurk]

If people choose to ignore the law, it takes ten extra legal steps followed by physical force to gain compliance.

Sin complicates things.

[Political Junkie Too]

If a state AG can pretend that the Supreme Court doesn't exist, can we pretend that the President doesn't exist?

If a state AG can pretend that Article III of the Constitution doesn't exist, can we pretend that Article II doesn't exist?

-PJ

[Elsie]

The radical right-wing majority of the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling ...