Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The Supreme Court be damned."

This is about to become the norm for the Left. The mask and gloves are off. The Constitution has been tossed out the window. This AG will openly defy the SCOTUS and NO ONE can or will stop her.

1 posted on 07/04/2023 6:18:29 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: devane617

“We don’t need no stinking badges”....


2 posted on 07/04/2023 6:22:05 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

No surprise about Mayes, she provides legal support for the cartels.


3 posted on 07/04/2023 6:22:22 AM PDT by chopperk ( C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

A pox and a curse on every Arizona cop who enforces tyranny.


4 posted on 07/04/2023 6:23:10 AM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

The Law means NOTHING to LAWLESS Demonrats


5 posted on 07/04/2023 6:23:33 AM PDT by afchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

If she’s elected, vote her out. If she’s appointed, vote the Governor out.


6 posted on 07/04/2023 6:24:55 AM PDT by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

And when a local business refuses service to a Trump supporter? Or someone that progressive socialist Democrats revile.


9 posted on 07/04/2023 6:27:43 AM PDT by Reno89519 (DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Congress granted many states the right to exist conditioned on “perfect religious freedom”.


10 posted on 07/04/2023 6:27:44 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

ATT owned this Radical Socialist Yahoo Commie News .

Stop funding Left Wing ATT .


11 posted on 07/04/2023 6:28:47 AM PDT by ncalburt ( Gop DC Globalists are the evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

The Left lives to stir up trouble. Agitprop is what it does best.

Conservatives wage a polite war, Libs are the Cong.

Maybe some white dude should go to a Black owned baker and request a cake celebrating the KKK.

What’s fair is fair until it isn’t fair anymore.


12 posted on 07/04/2023 6:29:19 AM PDT by Quentin Quarantino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Don’t be so sure. This might just be the beginning of a national divorce.

The Left only ASSUMES they run the country right now. Ask Anheuser-Busch & Targét who they think might be in charge. These governors and pissy AG’s better watch what emanates out of their pie holes in knee jerk reactions to having their political apple-carts upended.


13 posted on 07/04/2023 6:29:54 AM PDT by bigfootbob (Arm Up and Live Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

These people do not understand that the Supreme Court did not say that it’s OK to discriminate against gay people. What they said, was that a business and not be compelled to perform a service. In this case, the service is producing cakes with a gay wedding theme. If a straight couple who are friends with, a gay couple that was about to be “married,“ walked into that cake shop and asked for a gay themed cake, they would not get it. Note that they are not gay. It isn’t the person who’s being discriminated against, it is the activity in which individuals or businesses have the liberty to not engage.

Where are you would have discrimination is if the cake shop sold birthday cakes, just a standard “happy birthday, Timmy“ type of cake, and only sold it to people who were straight. A gay couple, or a gay person can walk into that cake shop and ask for such a cake, and receive it. They are not being discriminated against because they are gay, it is the cake itself that is being “discriminated against.” Freedom of speech necessarily includes the right, not to speak, and since speech also includes printing, and other forms of communication, including artwork, there is a right to not produce something that you don’t want to produce, which is absolutely necessary for a full and complete right to freedom of speech.


14 posted on 07/04/2023 6:35:07 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (“The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.” ― A.E. Van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

https://azsos.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-referendum-recall/recall


16 posted on 07/04/2023 6:38:09 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_recall_in_Arizona


18 posted on 07/04/2023 6:46:02 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Please correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn’t a Writ of Mandamus force the official to follow the law or, potentially, go to jail?


19 posted on 07/04/2023 6:46:27 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

“Radical right wing majority”? What the hell are those yahoos smoking down at Yahoo? What about the 1000s of far left, creepy Feral “judgies” down in the rest of the Feral Courts.


20 posted on 07/04/2023 6:47:26 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (A man in NM is killed over a movie theater seat. The azhos in The Swamp think guns are the problem. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

I know Yahoo hosts this as an opinion piece, but it is no different in tone or substance than their normal “news” articles.

Petulant, fear-mongering, racist, against all things good or normal. The depth of their journalism reminds me of an angry mob of 17 year-olds.

“The radical right-wing majority” “The extremist majority”...Hey, fools, you’re always telling us about “Our Democracy.” It’s dangerous when it enforces constitutional law over a policy they prefer, but heroic when it damns the law and upends thousands of years of civil practice. Get it? Yahoo does!


21 posted on 07/04/2023 6:51:03 AM PDT by Señor Presidente (Tyranny deserves insurrection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Figures. One of Janet Napolitano’s leftover hos who can’t get a real job.


22 posted on 07/04/2023 6:51:11 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (A man in NM is killed over a movie theater seat. The azhos in The Swamp think guns are the problem. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Posturing. They will comply. Watch.


23 posted on 07/04/2023 6:51:34 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Quotes on an Amendment XIV, Section 3 use by a judge:

A judge in New Mexico declared Tuesday that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot was an “insurrection” as he ruled that Otero County Commissioner and “Cowboys for Trump” founder Couy Griffin must be removed from office for participating in the attack.

Griffin is barred for life from holding any federal or state office — including his current role as county commissioner, from which he will be ousted “effective immediately,” Judge Francis Mathew ruled.

Griffin became “constitutionally disqualified” from those positions as of Jan. 6, 2021, the judge concluded.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars-cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html

“...all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution”

Article VI of the US Constitution


24 posted on 07/04/2023 6:52:57 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

so the law that says business open to the public can’t discriminate against people is not good enough ,LOL


26 posted on 07/04/2023 6:55:16 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson