US v. Texas, the decision is by Kavanaugh and the vote is 8-1.
This is a challenge to the Biden administration’s immigration-enforcement policy. The court holds that the states challenging the policy do not have standing to challenge the policy.
Here is the court’s opinion.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-58_i425.pdf
Definitely keeping my eye out on the Affirmative Action case.
If any of the decisions FAVOR the left...we will be hearing about it for weeks to come!
Standing. This comes up too often. Maybe the court could share some guidance on who has standing. Over the past 15+ years it seems increasingly that no one has standing, making this more of a cop-out then meaningful claim.
“The case was a challenge to the constitutionality of a federal law that prohibits “encouraging or inducing” illegal immigration.”
For people who think there’s “No difference between the parties” consider what this case was about. It was about the right of human traffickers to bring people into this country ILLEGALLY, and the Democrats were all-in on this.
Keep that in mind when you sit out the next election because the Republican on the ticket was not ‘pure’ enough for you.
I’m lazy. I admit it.
Have they made a decision on the NC case involving who is allowed to make election laws? IE…per the constitution, the state legislature makes the rules, not the SOSs, courts, Governors, nor Paul Elias
On first impression, the intent element for "encouraging" would seem easier to satisfy than that for "inducing".
If so, paying wages to a known illegal would seem sufficient. An interesting case to read.