[rod5591]

The women was upset that the Judge did not sentence the offender to prison as she requested. She was age 16 when she performed a sex act with her then boss. Age 16 is the age of consent in some US states. The Louisiana age of Consent is 17 years old.

I feel that her embrace of victimhood rather than responsibility will work against her in the long run.

[ConservativeMind]

If she’s under the age of consent, she can’t possibly have anything to claim as “victimhood.”

I’m upset you are pro-rape.

[Justa]

Hard to sue for damages without a criminal conviction. Her former boss obviously has shallow pockets so she goes after the prosecutor.

[bigbob]

Sad to say, this will continue to happen until people finally have had enough and demand mandatory sentences without judicial discretion. A 16 year old rape victim IS a victim to anyone who can comprehend the English language.

[bobbo666]

And, has she armed herself?

Betcha no.

[nickcarraway]

So, you think that the rapist of a 16 year old should go free, and she should just suck it up?

[Valpal1]

Two justices sided with Le Mon. Justice Jefferson Hughes III wrote the terse one-paragraph dissent. “The assistant district attorney was dishonest with both the victim and the judge,” Hughes wrote. “These intentional dishonest acts were outside the course and scope of his duties as an assistant district attorney.”

[Albion Wilde]

I feel that her embrace of victimhood rather than responsibility will work against her in the long run.

If the rapey boss was 18 or 21, you might have a point. But he was 11 years older than she, and in a position to abuse the power imbalance. If he was competent enough to be a "boss", surely he had come to understand the concept of "jail bait" by that age.