Replies

When NONE of them can answer the simple question “what is a woman?”, except with a circular answer like “somebody that identifies and is accepted by women as a woman”. Sorry, that isn’t a definition.

When they’re arguing that somebody is ‘trans’, they say you can ‘transition’ to the opposite sex, and if so, we’re back to ‘binary’ sexes (there’s only men and women)...where they’re also arguing sex and gender are different and gender is a social construct.

If a *man* doesn’t want to date a trans-woman, you’re transphobic. But what is a “man” as we can’t define a woman? When you say you “feel like a woman”. How would you know? You’ve never been one. Gay *men* (there’s that word again) don’t want to date trans-men. So transphobic right? Resorting to definitions which include “a non-man”, to mean something about lesbians that includes trans-women, when “man” can’t be defined....it’s just NUTS!!!

Now I heard a man that is ‘trans’ and has ‘transitioned’ to be a woman but identifies as a lesbian, so is attracted to women, is a valid identity. To think they argue that all this should be considered “normal” and the State has decided that your children must be taught this, no dissent, and if you don’t “affirm your child’s gender” you can have your child taken, it’s all tyrannical. Hormone blockers on minors! Cut off breasts! Chemical castration!

And we haven’t even got to men being in women’s private places (bathrooms, changing rooms, prisons, shelters(!)) or competing in sports with women.

Then they try the argument, why do you care? It doesn’t impact YOU. What??? At this point YES, it does. It can impact ANYONE.

If you can believe that all makes sense, then you can call yourself a leftist. Somehow, just maybe, most people, the large majority, see this for what it is.