Posted on 06/14/2023 9:44:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
A federal judge has created a preliminary injunction which prevents the city of Seattle from enforcing the law against graffiti and misdemeanor property destruction. The SPD released a statement today.
Late yesterday afternoon, SPD received an order from a US District Court judge that enjoined, in full, enforcement of SMC 12A.080.020 – the City’s misdemeanor property destruction law. This means that until further order of the Court, SPD cannot take action on damage to property under this law. This is not a matter within SPD or City discretion; we are bound by the court order as it is written.
We understand and share the concerns that are being relayed to us by our community, businesses and residents alike. We know, as evidenced by the thousands of calls for service we receive each year reporting acts of vandalism and other forms of property damage that property damage is, in fact, a crime that is of significance to community members. SPD is working closely with the Mayor’s Office and City Attorney’s Office to assess next steps with the Court.
Seattle saw a big surge of graffiti during the pandemic. It was up 52% in 2021 compared to 2019 numbers. Because this was a surging problem, Seattle’s mayor Bruce Harrell announced a plan to combat the problem last year.
“We have an opportunity to envision a more beautiful Seattle – with murals and canvasses that reflect our values of creativity, inclusion, and forward thinking,” said Mayor Harrell. “Not only does tagging and graffiti detract from the vibrancy of our city, there are tangible impacts on communities targeted by hate speech, small business owners whose shops are defaced, and residents who rely on City signage for information and guidance. Incidents of graffiti have dramatically increased throughout the pandemic, and progress requires a One Seattle approach, where we work together to advance proven solutions, reduce silos, and tap into our greatest resource – our community.”
But even before this plan was launched, a group of Seattle residents wrote some messages (allegedly in chalk and charcoal) on “eco-block” walls set up outside SPD’s east precinct. If that sounds familiar, it’s because the east precinct is the one that was abandoned by the city in the summer of 2020 in deference to the fine people who created the CHAZ/CHOP, i.e. the autonomous zone in the city’s Capitol Hill neighborhood. So these four people allegedly wrote anti-police slogans on the blocks near the precinct including “peaceful protest.” All four were arrested and charged with violating the misdemeanor graffiti law which currently reads:
A person is guilty of property destruction if the person intentionally:
1. Damages the property of another; or
2. Writes, paints, or draws any inscription, figure, or mark of any type on any public or private building or other structure or any real or personal property owned by any other person unless the person has obtained the express permission of the owner or operator of the property.
The four individuals sued the city claiming their rights under the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and Fourth Amendment were violated. Yesterday, the judge set up the preliminary injunction on the grounds that she believes they are likely to win the case. From the judge’s order.
Here, the Ordinance plainly targets expressive speech in a real and substantial way that infringes on Plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to free expression. The Ordinance criminalizes “[w]riting, paint[ing], or draw[ing] any inscription, figure, or mark of any type.” SMC 12A.08.020. This appears overbroad on its face. And although the Ordinance also criminalizes “property destruction,” it equally targets speech. As such, it has a close enough nexus to expression that it poses a real and substantial threat of censorship. Defendants advance no plausible argument or basis to conclude that the Ordinance could be read otherwise. Additionally, the Court finds Plaintiffs are likely to show that there is no substantial governmental interest in foreclosing expressive conduct as the Ordinance does or that the Ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve that interest…On its face, the Ordinance sweeps so broadly that it criminalizes innocuous drawings (from a child’s drawing of a mermaid to pro-police messages written by the Seattle Police Foundation (see Supp. Compl. ¶¶ 4.40-4.41)) that can hardly be said to constitute “visual blight” and which would naturally wash away in the next rain storm. Based on the record before it, the Court finds the Ordinance fails to narrowly target the purported visual blight. The Court finds that Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim.
So it sounds to me like the judge is arguing that the law is too broad because it doesn’t allow for chalking. Of course, anyone who has paid attention to the graffiti in Seattle over the past couple years knows that’s not really the issue. The issue is leftist’s paining anti-police slogans on everything. Here’s Seattle’s former police chief Carmen Best describing the CHOP back in 2020:
Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best on CHOP zone: "I was just stunned by the… amount of graffiti, garbage and property destruction." pic.twitter.com/7z7ZI8huVO
— The Hill (@thehill) July 2, 2020
It was everywhere and it wasn’t chalk:
Fresh CHOP ink. New barriers > already painted #andrewjacobmedia #blm #chop #chaz #seattle #wa #washington #state #capitolhillseattle #caphill #chopseattle #georgefloyd #protest #capitolhillautonomouszone #CapitolHillOccupiedProtest #art #streetart #graffiti #graffitiart
pic.twitter.com/cw7gYan3ua— AndrewJacobMedia (@andrewjamedia) June 18, 2020
@blackgirlinmain I spent 2 months in the "CHOP" zone in Capitol Hill, Seattle. And took thousands of pictures of the art, graffiti and Slogans. I also participated in several marches from the "CHOP" zone to the Seattle Police Headquarters. BLM respected me for my participation.
pic.twitter.com/RfgUricIzM— TJ BEERS (@TJ62Beers) March 15, 2021
Jamil jumps onto a barricade with graffiti reading 'cop free zone' as his parents stand nearby at the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest in Seattle. More photos from inside CHOP:
https://t.co/1szvXBUAbi 📷 @lindseywasson pic.twitter.com/9jrWpuoumT— Reuters Pictures (@reuterspictures) June 29, 2020
Anyway, until this case is resolved it seems no one can be arrested or charged for spraying anti-police messages on city property. I suspect there is a contingent of people in Seattle who will take advantage of this judge turning the entire city into a police-free autonomous zone for taggers.
A senior moment "judge" for the Western District of Washington.
The judge needs to have his house and then his face covered in graffiti to clear his mind.
This is what a failed nation state looks like.
Finished.
Wow. Just wow. I realize this is a fed judge but this is the same state that told private property owners that they could NOT remove tenants who refused to pay rent because of Covid.
It seems like the Monarchy owns everything now doesn’t it?
The whole issue is rather moot, because, as a misdemeanor offense police couldn’t enforce it. The value is such that the perpetrators/artists couldn’t be jailed.
It is a typical ‘feel good’ by the leftists who fail to see all the ramifications of their stupidity.
I was in Seattle last month, the first time I had been there in seven years. It’s really turned into a craphole.
Round and round we go, though not so merrily, circling the drain...
She's made sure her address in Seattle has been scrubbed from the Internet.
Laws for thee, oh little man...
RE: reflect our values
(in the middle of quote section.)
They’d shriek loudly if someone portrayed the Founding Fathers, veterans in combat or a Christian scene or creche at Christmas outside.
Since when does a judge have he authority to dictate to another n=branch of government how to enforce the law?
Yup. If it were up to me, anyone found in the process of spraying grafitti paint would be arrested and dropped into a vat of oil-based paint.
If I repaint/scrub/sandblast my wall to remove the vandals’ scrawls, am I guilty of impinging on their first amendment rights or illegal destruction of their “artistic” property and subject to arrest in the bizzaro world of Seattle?
How crazy is this?! The judge should resign in shame or be impeached.
There is probably a city permit, inspection requirement, and fee of course to remove “1st amendment art” from your property.
This is the second article tonight I’ve read here, that convinces me without a shadow of a doubt that America is finished.
We are done, finished as a nation.
....it is just a matter of waiting until the last one to leave turns out the light!!!!..sad!!
We need to get this same judge to rule on Deep State/Big tech censorship
I thought I had posted this on the other thread but I can’t find it. Anyway, from Washington State Law on the use of force:
3) Whenever used by a party about to be injured, or by another lawfully aiding him or her, in preventing or attempting to prevent an offense against his or her person, or a malicious trespass, or other malicious interference with real or personal property lawfully in his or her possession, in case the force is not more than is necessary;
Although I suppose that this latest rulings and perhaps previous rulings have made this law mute.
I assume the judge is a D appointee and, therefore, Seattle voted for this.
ICE needs to start issuing cans of spray paint to illegal aliens and dropping them off in front of all the court houses for some dayz of fun and art in the sun. “Judgey” don’t care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
