[Erik Latranyi]

...if Hungary wants to be in the 31-member alliance and wants to buy its weapons and have its soldiers and sailors willing to die to protect Hungary, then they cannot prevent it from getting better and more effective, especially for no reason.

Please show me in the NATO Charter where members must obey the expansion wishes of the US.

You can't, so your point is invalid.

NATO members are equals in decisions about expansion.

[Sirius Lee]

NATO members are equals in decisions about expansion.

That's not how a globalist empire run by pedophiles and criminals works!

[ansel12]

What are you talking about?

Hungary can do what it wants, we don’t have to sell them things we don’t want to sell them.

No one can be forced to sell their goods to Hungary.

[ought-six]

“Please show me in the NATO Charter where members must obey the expansion wishes of the US. You can’t, so your point is invalid.”

False assumption. You need to take a basic course in logic.

In any event, ansel12’s argument does hold some validity: If Hungary — as a NATO member — expects NATO countries to come to its defense, and commit its sons and daughters to protect Hungary’s sons and daughters, then it would be pretty cheeky of Hungary to oppose strengthening the NATO alliance, and in fact would be against its own interests.

So, the real question is not IF Hungary can prevent Sweden’s joining NATO — it CAN — but WHY it would want to oppose it?