Posted on 06/13/2023 6:15:00 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Most conservatives understand that so-called journalists who call themelves “fact-checkers” function as enforcement arms for the current Narrative being pushed by the Democrat-media complex. But there are plenty of other people, who read only what the progressive media bubble allows, that still believe the job title has some legitimacy. For them, this nifty bit of research performed by Robert Schmad in today’s Free Beacon will be enlightening. Cutting to the chase for the answer to the headline above:
The Free Beacon reviewed political donations over the past four election cycles from those who identified their occupation as "fact checker." $22,580 of the $22,683 in political donations that came from self-identified fact checkers during that time—a whopping 99.5 percent—went to Democrats and liberal groups. Only three of the fact checker donations made during that period went to Republicans. Top recipients include socialist Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, who during the seven-year period received ten times more fact checker money than every Republican combined.
That rounds off to 100%, of course, but those 3 exceptional souls do deserve some notice, so the Freeb’s headline is best:
“Fact Check: Nearly 100 Percent of Political Contributions From Fact Checkers Go to Democrats”
Just leaving it at that and not reading the whole article would deprive you of some delicious nuggets, such as:
The [New York] Times fact checker, Cecilia Nowell, contributed three times to Warren's failed presidential bid from 2019 to 2020 and still accepts "fact-checking assignments" from the outlet on a freelance basis, according to her LinkedIn. Reuters, meanwhile, from 2020 to 2021 employed Carrie Monahan, daughter of veteran journalist Katie Couric, as a "fact check producer." Monahan during that time contributed to Biden, Harrison, and Georgia Democratic senator Jon Ossoff.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
In a 2020 fact check, for instance, the Times accused Arkansas senator Tom Cotton of flirting with conspiracy theories when the Republican suggested that COVID-19 may have originated in a Chinese research lab. Federal investigations have since corroborated the lab leak theory Cotton promoted.
Fact checkers working for Facebook, meanwhile, last year erroneously designated as misinformation a Free Beacon report on Biden's Department of Health and Human Services, which was set to fund the distribution of safe smoking kits with crack pipes. Facebook's fact checker, Lead Stories, kept the piece in place even after the Free Beacon proved that federally-funded harm reduction organizations distributed crack pipes.
Fact checkers have even gone as far as to tell readers how they can (and can't) respond to factual information. When the Free Beacon in July reported that the Biden administration sold one million Strategic Petroleum Reserve barrels to a Chinese state-controlled gas giant, the Washington Post acknowledged in a subsequent fact check that the sale happened. Still, the Post's Glenn Kessler wrote, there's "no reason for outrage" and "anyone who suggests the Biden administration is doing something wrong here … earns Three Pinocchios."
I tried to explain this 15 years ago (elsewhere) to some regarding Snopes. During the run-up to Obama.
Basically to no avail.
It’s been a frustrating battle. How do you debate someone who refuses to the obvious ?
And a lot of these limited information voters are independents and republicans.
Many of my pub acquaintances still know nothing of the Burisma scandal.
Dunno. They banned me for not be respectful enough to the Usurper. Fine by me. They can have him and all that goes with him.
In many ways, it was for the better. Let me know where they really were. I was surprised a bit but shouldn’t have been.
Especially after one of them exclaimed: “I think he’s a Christian!”.
The blindness was truly astonishing.
One of the few fact checkers who contributed to Republicans seemingly felt the need to obscure her identity—the Google employee listed her address as "123 No Name Drive." Conservative tech employees have long said they feel the need to self-censor their views
More evidence of the "tolerance" of the leftists - if you don't agree with them, you live in fear of being fired, ostracized, or even assaulted by them.
Snopes: An ultraliberal couple and their cat. The cat is the smartest one of the three.
Yep, but he got rid of the fat wife and traded her for another gal long ago.
These "Fact Checkers" are real life manifestations of Orwell's MINITRUE.
Not as fat, just as loony left?
Love it! The lefty husband fund raised from other leftists to keep it afloat, then looted the company. Do you suppose this is where Black Lives Matter came up with the idea?
Dunno - IIRC there was once an article where wife #2 could be rented for like $5,000 a day or something. (prior to then)
Been a long time since I saw it. It was here on FR at that time.
Purer than Ivory Soap.
Bernard Goldberg pointed out the liberal media bias in 2001 in his book aptly titled âÂÂBiasâÂÂ. It was a seminal read for me, like someone finally turned the lights on in a dark room.
Of course, Back then in the good old days the ratio was only 93% liberal.
https://www.amazon.com/Bias-Insider-Exposes-Media-Distort/dp/0895261901
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.