Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Top Department of Justice Official Blows Up Jack Smith’s Case Against President Trump With One Tweet – Notices Key Item on Third Page of the Federal Indictment That Is “Grounds for Granting a Motion” to Dismiss
The Gateway Pundit ^ | June 10, 2023 | Cullen Linebargar

Posted on 06/10/2023 10:46:42 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

A former top Department of Justice official completely blew up Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump with one simple tweet on Friday. He claims there is a key piece of information in the indictment that is grounds for a quick dismissal.

..... Snip.....

CNN “reported” on May 31 that federal prosecutors had “obtained an audio recording of a summer 2021 meeting in which former President Donald Trump acknowledges he held onto a classified Pentagon document about a potential attack on Iran.” The network claims this destroys Trump’s argument that he declassified everything.

Jeffrey Clark, who served as an assistant attorney general in the Trump administration, says the leak is grounds for having the case tossed. Moreover, it proves Biden’s corrupt DOJ was the source of the leaks rather than Trump’s attorneys.

The details regarding the recording of Bedminster call is in the sixth paragraph of page 3 of the indictment.

Here are the relevant parts of the tweet:

I’m beginning to read the indictment against Trump. But even three pages in, it’s clear that the leaks that preceded the indictment are far too close to what is actually being pleaded by DOJ to be a coincidence.

For example, in paragraph 6a on page 3, we hear about the recording of the Bedminster call, which the MSNBC’s of the world have been beating a dead horse about for quite a while based on such leaks.

This means that Trump lawyers could not possibly be the source of the leaks.

Ergo, the leaks are coming from DOJ. They must be investigated and punished.

Also, this is grounds for granting a motion highlighting jury pool poisoning and dismissing the indictment before it reaches even its one-month birthday.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bidengate; doj; fbi; harassment; jacksmith; jeffreyclark; joebiden; miamigrandjury; persecution; specialcounsel; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Combine this plus Jack Smith omitting several of Trump's words from the recorded call in the transcript given to the Miami Grand Jury, THIS IS grounds for dismissal.
1 posted on 06/10/2023 10:46:42 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Is there enough for a Trump-nominated judge to dismiss the charges with prejudice and sanction the government? Would a judge do this? And if they did, would Smith just turn his attention to his ongoing efforts in DC?


2 posted on 06/10/2023 10:53:29 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Donald Tantrum? No Thank You. We Can Do Better! I am a Veteran Supporting Veteran DeSantis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

There is also a problem about lawyer - client confidentiality. I predict a lot of evidence will be thrown out because of this problem.


3 posted on 06/10/2023 10:54:28 AM PDT by convoter2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Grounds is one thing, but not enough in this environment.


4 posted on 06/10/2023 10:54:37 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

These “blow it up with a tweet”, “shoot it down with a zinger” headlines are sophomoric and misleading. Only in a fantasy world (and on a Perry Mason TV show) are such court cases dismissed summarily, in such a sweeping, satisfying manner. Conservatives are hoping for a deus ex machina.


5 posted on 06/10/2023 10:57:16 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

I thought the evidence gathered in DC was the evidence given to the Miami Grand Jury.


6 posted on 06/10/2023 10:58:29 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

These “blow it up with a tweet”, “shoot it down with a zinger” headlines


Yes, ignore ALL headlines but read the articles. It does have merit.


7 posted on 06/10/2023 11:04:05 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Unfortunately, like Turley, most people think that people who lie under oath are punished, but when it comes to lying about Trump there is no punishment, only rewards. The bigger the lie the bigger the reward. None of the liars have been punished, and none of them will ever be punished.


8 posted on 06/10/2023 11:13:09 AM PDT by euram (allALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Also:

Smith brought in Trump's lawyers and deposed them. He now lists them as material witnsesses, thus they had to step down as Trump Council.

I am not a lawyer, but this sure smacks as an unethical move on Smith's part.

9 posted on 06/10/2023 11:13:34 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
These “blow it up with a tweet”, “shoot it down with a zinger” headlines are sophomoric and misleading.

It wouldn’t be Gateway Pundit without bombs and explosions going off all over the place.
10 posted on 06/10/2023 11:16:19 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
Re: "a Trump-nominated judge"

Trump did nominate Judge Aileen Cannon, but Senate Democrats confirmed her.

Only 44 Republicans showed up for work that day.

12 Democrats pushed her across the Finish Line.

Politically, this was not an inspiring victory for judicial Conservatives.

11 posted on 06/10/2023 11:19:59 AM PDT by zeestephen (Trump "Lost" By 43,000 Votes - Spread Across Three States - GA, WI, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

there will be outcomes NOT expected from the desantis, mitch, “please clap” bush and hillary crowd when they all decided to pursue this against the president.

the system may be complex and appear to be powerful but not all of it is under their control.


12 posted on 06/10/2023 11:21:28 AM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (When the bad guys have leverage they use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The Super Kangaroo Court will jump very high to jail Trump


13 posted on 06/10/2023 11:27:26 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

We are always hoping to find a deuce en machina.


14 posted on 06/10/2023 11:29:52 AM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
These “blow it up with a tweet”, “shoot it down with a zinger” headlines are sophomoric and misleading. Only in a fantasy world (and on a Perry Mason TV show) are such court cases dismissed summarily, in such a sweeping, satisfying manner. Conservatives are hoping for a deus ex machina.

In other words, criminal cases don't get easily tossed, even when they never should have been approved. This is all part of the destruction of constitutional checks on the criminal justice system as the country has become more authoritarian.
15 posted on 06/10/2023 11:30:12 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
"CNN “reported” on May 31 that federal prosecutors had “obtained an audio recording of a summer 2021 meeting in which former President Donald Trump acknowledges he held onto a classified Pentagon document about a potential attack on Iran.”

I believe this refers to Milley's scheme for an attack on Iran that Trump opposed and which never happened. Since Trump was no longer in office, this was already old news when Trump allegedly talked about it.
16 posted on 06/10/2023 11:31:44 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

The whole thing is highly unusual and really stinks.


17 posted on 06/10/2023 11:44:52 AM PDT by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


18 posted on 06/10/2023 11:45:48 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=40%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
The details regarding the recording of Bedminster call is in the sixth paragraph of page 3 of the indictment.

Who made the recording and how did the government obtain it? FBI/NSA wiretap? More FISA court fabrications? I see no reason why Trump would record such a phone call.

These are things we must know to determine the chain of evidence and if its admissible in a criminal proceeding.

19 posted on 06/10/2023 11:46:33 AM PDT by usurper (AI was born with a birth defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usurper

I’m betting it was through a wiretap.


20 posted on 06/10/2023 11:56:44 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson