Replies

" Trump did nominate Judge Aileen Cannon, but Senate Democrats confirmed her. Only 44 Republicans showed up for work that day. 12 Democrats pushed her across the Finish Line. Politically, this was not an inspiring victory for judicial Conservatives."

So what? Did you not read Judge Cannon's orders after the Mar-A-Lago raid? She will not react kindly to this hubris of indicting Trump aide Walt Nauta.

Did Biden's aides have the appropriate security clearances?

This is exactly what District Judge Aileen Cannon referenced in the Mar-a-Lago raid:

Page 15, note 1: "In explaining these incidents at the hearing, counsel from the Privilege Review Team characterized them as examples of the filter process working. The Court is not so sure.
These instances certainly are demonstrative of integrity on the part of the Investigative Team members who returned the potentially privileged material. But they also indicate that, on more than one occasion, the Privilege Review Team’s initial screening failed to identify potentially privileged material.
The Government’s other explanation—that these instances were the result of adopting an overinclusive view of potentially privileged material out of an abundance of caution—does not satisfy the Court either.
Even accepting the Government’s untested premise, the use of a broad standard for potentially privileged material does not explain how qualifying material ended up in the hands of the Investigative Team.
Perhaps most concerning, the Filter Review Team’s Report does not indicate that any steps were taken after these instances of exposure to wall off the two tainted members of the Investigation Team [see ECF No. 40].
In sum, without drawing inferences, there is a basis on this record to question how materials passed through the screening process, further underscoring the importance of procedural safeguards and an additional layer of review.
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 454 F.3d 511, 523 (6th Cir. 2006) (“In United States v. Noriega, 764 F. Supp. 1480 (S.D. Fla. 1991), for instance, the government’s taint team missed a document obviously protected by attorney-client privilege, by turning over tapes of attorney-client conversations to members of the investigating team. This Noriega incident points to an obvious flaw in the taint team procedure: the government’s fox is left in charge of the appellants’ henhouse, and may err by neglect or malice, as well as by honest differences of opinion.”)."

But Biden's counsel found his last batch, or his legal team of what, paralegals? Runners? Gophers? None of whom ever had clearance to handle SCIF material!

So Nauta's indictment is a non-starter, and Cannon will likely be harsh on the DOJ for having attempted to make an example of an ordinary American by bankrupting him through federal lawfare.