Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kari Lake’s attorney: Evidence of rushed ballot verification warrants overturning 2022 election
Just the News ^ | 5/19/23 | Natalia Mittelstadt

Posted on 05/20/2023 8:42:28 AM PDT by CFW

The trial brought by Kari Lake over questionable ballot counting and verification in her unsuccessful 2022 Arizona gubernatorial campaign concluded Friday with her lead attorney saying audit data on the processes shows “this election should be set aside.”

The trial lasted three days, with closing arguments on both sides focusing on whether there was mathematical evidence proving that Lake had actually won the election.

Lake fell about 17,000 votes short in the official count in her race against then-Secretary of State Hobbs.

She is suing Hobbs, the current Democratic governor, in addition to current Secretary of State Adrian Fontes (D) and Maricopa County election officials, requesting last year's election results be invalidated or that she be declared the winner.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arizona; governor; hobbs; lake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
I wasn't able to watch much of yesterday's trial but I've read a little about testimony on the process and speed in which signatures were verified. There is no way that election workers actually confirmed signatures of the absentee ballots as is required by law.
1 posted on 05/20/2023 8:42:28 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Bookmark


2 posted on 05/20/2023 8:44:44 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW; dragnet2
On Friday he [Valenzuela] was asked questions about a viral video showing a signature verifier blasting through the process.

Here’s that viral video:


(Excerpt) Read more at infowars.com ...

3 posted on 05/20/2023 8:49:38 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Well if its that easy........


4 posted on 05/20/2023 8:49:53 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW; RitaOK; AFB-XYZ

I wasn’t able to watch much of yesterday’s trial but I’ve read a little about testimony on the process and speed in which signatures were verified. There is no way that election workers actually confirmed signatures of the absentee ballots as is required by law.

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.


5 posted on 05/20/2023 8:50:22 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Other than the MYSTERIOUS drops of audio and video from the live courtroom feed that plagued viewers throughout the trial, I found the evidence to be quite compelling.

One video showed a signature verification person approving ballots at a rate of 1 per every two or three seconds. THIS IS NOT VERIFICATION. THIS IS FRAUD. Since it's the DemonRats who CHEAT, merely approving ballots without actually verifying them BENEFITS HOBBS, NOT LAKE.

If Judge Thompson rules against Lake, HE'S A FRAUD AS WELL because her team didn't just PROVE a failed verification process, THEY SHOWED VIDEOS FROM THE VOTE COUNT CENTER THAT PROVED IT.

An election RE-DO is the only solution. A RE-DO where EVERY POLL WORKER IS OBSERVED AT ALL TIMES.

The ballot printer errors mostly in Republican districts is the other FRAUD that MUST be addressed. THIS WAS INTENTIONAL, 100%.

The people of Arizona were:
ROBBED BY HOBBS!!!

6 posted on 05/20/2023 8:50:27 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The problem is the once again the Judge set up an impossible standard. Lake has to prove they willfully ignored the law. In other words she has to prove what they were thinking


7 posted on 05/20/2023 8:55:25 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden

see post #3


8 posted on 05/20/2023 9:00:08 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CFW
There is no way that election workers actually confirmed signatures of the absentee ballots as is required by law.

Yup, that should be the bar for redoing this election, but I believe the judge has put up a higher bar.

9 posted on 05/20/2023 9:02:12 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
I watched part of the video side by side...two different people observing signatures and it's noticeable they are proceeding at two different rates. Hardly conclusive. My daughter would be the faster one...I would be the slower observer.

Fast and slow?? either they do or do not match. It's the result...not the speed. Speed is only a variable.

It's like a typist who does 120 words a minute with "0" errors and a typist who does 110 words a minute but with "10" errors.

10 posted on 05/20/2023 9:02:34 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden

“I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.”

Who thinks it is a good idea for election workers to have access to these ballots at home with no watchers or surveillance?


11 posted on 05/20/2023 9:02:54 AM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Despite the blurring, you can see the subject’s head turn as he continues to click his mouse.

Anyone who would accept that he’s doing actual ‘verification’ is a brainless dumbass.

Any official - judge, bureaucrat or LEO - who would argue in favor of ‘verification’ by said subject is by default a domestic enemy worthy of justifiable action under oaths to protect the US Constitution...by any means necessary.


12 posted on 05/20/2023 9:04:25 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thinden
I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.

Yup, it's the culture of cheating and stealing elections that needs to change.

13 posted on 05/20/2023 9:04:48 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Its not that it was “rushed”. Its that they could not possibly be doing real signature match checks in the time alloted for each one that they certified. It averaged out to less than 3 seconds each.

Just checking that there is an actual signature of some kind is not a signature match check as required by Arizona law.


14 posted on 05/20/2023 9:06:04 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Put the video on full screen on a >15” display and you can see the subject’s head turn as he continues to click his mouse.

That person wasn’t verifying anything, just following ideology (or orders).


15 posted on 05/20/2023 9:07:13 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Please notice also that the one on the right keeps fiddling with the mouse. It becomes apparent this is a very inexperienced operator. My friend who edits law books says the one on the left could be her...but she said she could probably beat her, too. Can you say efficient?


16 posted on 05/20/2023 9:07:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

You are correct. I would not overturn an election based on that video.

I still believe they “stole” the election by screwing up the voting in the county that was going for Lake.


17 posted on 05/20/2023 9:10:26 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Fast and slow?? either they do or do not match. It's the result...not the speed. Speed is only a variable.

With a fast typist, you can easily verify the typists results by reading the final typed product.

When do we get to audit the speedy signature verifier's results??

I bet it's going to be never.

18 posted on 05/20/2023 9:10:58 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Its conclusive. There is simply no way you can actually match the signatures in 3 seconds.


19 posted on 05/20/2023 9:12:40 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Williams
You are correct. I would not overturn an election based on that video.

Based on the video, if I were the judge, I would request a signature audit. Has one been done?

20 posted on 05/20/2023 9:13:23 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson