Posted on 05/20/2023 8:42:28 AM PDT by CFW
The trial brought by Kari Lake over questionable ballot counting and verification in her unsuccessful 2022 Arizona gubernatorial campaign concluded Friday with her lead attorney saying audit data on the processes shows “this election should be set aside.”
The trial lasted three days, with closing arguments on both sides focusing on whether there was mathematical evidence proving that Lake had actually won the election.
Lake fell about 17,000 votes short in the official count in her race against then-Secretary of State Hobbs.
She is suing Hobbs, the current Democratic governor, in addition to current Secretary of State Adrian Fontes (D) and Maricopa County election officials, requesting last year's election results be invalidated or that she be declared the winner.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
Bookmark
Here’s that viral video:
(Excerpt) Read more at infowars.com ...
Well if its that easy........
I wasn’t able to watch much of yesterday’s trial but I’ve read a little about testimony on the process and speed in which signatures were verified. There is no way that election workers actually confirmed signatures of the absentee ballots as is required by law.
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.
One video showed a signature verification person approving ballots at a rate of 1 per every two or three seconds. THIS IS NOT VERIFICATION. THIS IS FRAUD. Since it's the DemonRats who CHEAT, merely approving ballots without actually verifying them BENEFITS HOBBS, NOT LAKE.
If Judge Thompson rules against Lake, HE'S A FRAUD AS WELL because her team didn't just PROVE a failed verification process, THEY SHOWED VIDEOS FROM THE VOTE COUNT CENTER THAT PROVED IT.
An election RE-DO is the only solution. A RE-DO where EVERY POLL WORKER IS OBSERVED AT ALL TIMES.
The ballot printer errors mostly in Republican districts is the other FRAUD that MUST be addressed. THIS WAS INTENTIONAL, 100%.
The people of Arizona were:
ROBBED BY HOBBS!!!
The problem is the once again the Judge set up an impossible standard. Lake has to prove they willfully ignored the law. In other words she has to prove what they were thinking
see post #3
Yup, that should be the bar for redoing this election, but I believe the judge has put up a higher bar.
Fast and slow?? either they do or do not match. It's the result...not the speed. Speed is only a variable.
It's like a typist who does 120 words a minute with "0" errors and a typist who does 110 words a minute but with "10" errors.
“I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.”
Who thinks it is a good idea for election workers to have access to these ballots at home with no watchers or surveillance?
Despite the blurring, you can see the subject’s head turn as he continues to click his mouse.
Anyone who would accept that he’s doing actual ‘verification’ is a brainless dumbass.
Any official - judge, bureaucrat or LEO - who would argue in favor of ‘verification’ by said subject is by default a domestic enemy worthy of justifiable action under oaths to protect the US Constitution...by any means necessary.
Yup, it's the culture of cheating and stealing elections that needs to change.
Its not that it was “rushed”. Its that they could not possibly be doing real signature match checks in the time alloted for each one that they certified. It averaged out to less than 3 seconds each.
Just checking that there is an actual signature of some kind is not a signature match check as required by Arizona law.
Put the video on full screen on a >15” display and you can see the subject’s head turn as he continues to click his mouse.
That person wasn’t verifying anything, just following ideology (or orders).
Please notice also that the one on the right keeps fiddling with the mouse. It becomes apparent this is a very inexperienced operator. My friend who edits law books says the one on the left could be her...but she said she could probably beat her, too. Can you say efficient?
You are correct. I would not overturn an election based on that video.
I still believe they “stole” the election by screwing up the voting in the county that was going for Lake.
With a fast typist, you can easily verify the typists results by reading the final typed product.
When do we get to audit the speedy signature verifier's results??
I bet it's going to be never.
Its conclusive. There is simply no way you can actually match the signatures in 3 seconds.
Based on the video, if I were the judge, I would request a signature audit. Has one been done?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.