Kari Lake's election trial enters second day (VIDEO)

YouTube ^ | May 18, 2023

[11th_VA]

Here's a LINK to part of the trial today.

It starts with a 'Signature Verification Expert' that has a lifetime of experience being questioned about some data.

They have computer data showing Admins were spending 2-6 seconds per signature and validating up to 99% signatures - he said those rates would be impossible to achieve at the volumes they were doing (tens of thousands for each admin)

[11th_VA]

They State goes after the witness and tries to impugn his reputation and 30 years of expertise - they cherry pick statements from trials he testified at, and try to damage his reputation - the signature expert has 30 years of courtroom experience and handles himself very well.

[Blood of Tyrants]

That’s what attorneys do. They will attack the witness ONLY on the parts that help their case.

[BushCountry]

The judge will rule that it is humanly possible for a person to signature check 30,000 ballots in 3 seconds each with a 99.8% approval rate in a deeply balloted harvested democrat county.

Nothing to see here the judge will say.

[spokeshave]

I watched the video of two signature verifiers in adjacent booths.....the speedy guy should be fired..and his remuneration withheld.

[Buckeye Battle Cry]

AND...not one damned thing will change. The ruling will be used to further cement the fraud in Maricopa as “law” and “unassailable”.

[Dr. Franklin]

The judge will rule that it is humanly possible for a person to signature check 30,000 ballots in 3 seconds each with a 99.8% approval rate in a deeply balloted harvested democrat county.
Nothing to see here the judge will say.

Listening to the witness from Maricopa County, his argument is that they weren't actually verifying the signatures because these people had voted in person. It appears the official explanation is changing, and evidence was likely altered to fix the problem.

[BushCountry]

“Listening to the witness from Maricopa County, his argument is that they weren’t actually verifying the signatures because these people had voted in person. It appears the official explanation is changing, and evidence was likely altered to fix the problem.”

The process even for same day voting is that the have to show valid and sign for the ballot. When they sign for a ballot the signature on the ID must match the sign for ballot copy.

Where they making people show a valid ID? Where they comparing the signature on the ID to the signature on the ballot request? Even if what you say is true (I don’t doubt you, but I do doubt the Dem county), I do not even remotely believe they followed the law.