I would remind you of the Fog of War.
In WW2, during the D-Day invasion of Europe, *every* German tank reported (especially destroyed) was a “Tiger”, Hitler’s supertank. Germany would really have loved to have had as many Tigers as was reported. After the front had moved on, those destroyed tanks were surveyed - few of them were Tigers, most were Panzer IIIs and IVs.
There is every possibility that these were *not* hypersonics.
You mean that MSN might not report accurate information? How can that be possible? /s
‘There is every possibility that these were *not* hypersonics.”
Putin’s dumbass army was over-hyped. Same for his trashy hypersonic missiles.
The Ukies are righteous so they fear not >>>>>>
What does the Bible mean when it tells us to fear not?
https://www.gotquestions.org/fear-not.html
WebWhen the Bible tells us, “Do not fear,” it means we are not to allow anxiety or fretfulness to rule our lives or take root in our hearts. We are not to be people of panic. We are to be …
Just about every German tank was destroyed including the Tigers.
The Tiger was a very expensive and labor intensive tank to make.
Each tank required some 300,000 man hours to produce.
The Germans only made about 1,300 hundred of them with most of those going to the Russian front.
You’re right. The chances of any Allied tanker encountering a Tiger in Normandy or anywhere else on The Western front were about 1 in 10.