Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coronal
Wrong yet again!

The jury took the words of the judge, which E.Jean NEVER claimed, that he had kissed on on f=her face/cheek, which was an unwanted sexual abuse.

301 posted on 05/09/2023 5:22:46 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

No, SHE claimed that he had penetrated her vagina with either his penis or his fingers, she couldn’t be sure which it was. Either would be battery, but it would only meet the legal definition of rape if he had done it with his penis. You can argue about who you believe, but the jury believed her and they concluded that he had committed sexual battery. Did you even pay any attention to what she accused him of doing?


308 posted on 05/09/2023 6:05:55 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson