Skip to comments.
Report: Sotomayor got millions from publishing company while not recusing from cases
The Washington Times ^
| Thursday, May 4, 2023
| Alex Swoyer
Posted on 05/04/2023 5:48:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Different standards. She’s with the MSM side. ie protected. Thomas is on the bad side. Simple to understand...100% of the time.
Move along.
21
posted on
05/04/2023 6:51:46 PM PDT
by
Sir Bangaz Cracka
(Poor 'lil Travon bees slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
To: BenLurkin
The “wise Latina” has a LOT more ethical conflicts, and is a strong suspect in a certain aspect of release of information prematurely which took place recently. Just sayin’, ya know?
22
posted on
05/04/2023 7:03:17 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Fiction has to be at least plausible, while reality obeys no such constraint.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is not known how Justice Sotomayor voted on whether to take up either case, though she did not publicly recuse herself.So we don't know if she voted or not.
This story is half-baked.
23
posted on
05/04/2023 7:28:22 PM PDT
by
semimojo
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s okay because she’s not the wife of a justice. ;-)
To: Third Person
The first? I don’t know. There have been some torturous twisting of the Constitution to justify many decisions, e.g. the ruling that made abortion legal and the ruling that said that a farmer raising grain on his own land was subject to federal regulation because it somehow affected “interstate commerce”.
25
posted on
05/04/2023 7:47:27 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(It's science and therefore cannot be questioned!)
To: All
Until Hunter and Joe came up with the ‘painting’ thing, “Book deals” were the best way for politicians to launder money (outside of Ukraine, anyway).
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Will Turbin call for her impeachment. No chance!
27
posted on
05/04/2023 7:53:37 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: Texan5
"...since she was born in NY..." Exactly...😎
28
posted on
05/04/2023 8:01:48 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Need a trial for corruption, a conviction and prison term for her. All of this HAS to stop, no matter which party is involved.
29
posted on
05/04/2023 8:24:28 PM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Her clerk (at the time) is the leaker. It’s an open secret.
30
posted on
05/04/2023 9:57:45 PM PDT
by
Basket_of_Deplorables
(THE FBI INTERFERED IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Her clerk (at the time) is the leaker. It’s an open secret.
31
posted on
05/04/2023 9:58:38 PM PDT
by
Basket_of_Deplorables
(THE FBI INTERFERED IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!)
To: semimojo
So we don't know if she voted or not. This story is half-baked. "Transparency" does not apply to the Left.
32
posted on
05/05/2023 4:25:09 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Nothing to see here, we need to investigate Justice Thomas, not a great Justice like Sotomeyer... 🤓
33
posted on
05/05/2023 4:29:26 AM PDT
by
Deplorable American1776
(Guns don't kill people, LIBERALS DO!! Support the Second Amendment...)
To: BenLurkin
34
posted on
05/05/2023 4:32:14 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(Every Goliath has his David. )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Penguin Random House: “ Hey puta Sotomayor, here is 1.9 million for a children’s book that won’t sell and don’t forget our case coming up”.
35
posted on
05/05/2023 4:45:29 AM PDT
by
shoff
(Vote Democrat it beats thinking!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Transparency" does not apply to the Left. And neither does "hypocrisy."
36
posted on
05/05/2023 8:00:52 AM PDT
by
CDB
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Outstanding! We can have impeachment votes on both Justice Thomas and the “wise Latina” on the same day.
To: Rdct29
Does she still identify as a WISE LATINA? Being the good little progressive she is doesn't she now call herself a wise LATINX?
38
posted on
05/05/2023 11:45:21 AM PDT
by
Impala64ssa
(If a liar's pants really did catch on fire The View, ABC, CNN, MSNBC would be more fun to watch)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Report? Isn’t this stuff public?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson