Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MoochPooch

Egypt had the Nile River with its rich farmland and, more importantly, the Mediterranean Sea. Natural Resources and access to trade — a winning combination for prosperity.

Sub-Saharan Africa had few navigable rivers or ocean harbors. They were screwed.


40 posted on 04/19/2023 9:37:16 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler

Have you read “Guns, Germs and Steel”? by Jared Diamond?

The sub-saharan Africans - of which there are 3 races:
1. Khoi-san (bushmen)
2. pygmies
3. bantu speakers

all had it great before the end of the last ice age in 10K BC — they had food plenty and warmth. The rest of the world was a frozen spitball (I exaggerate), but they had it good.

The same for the Aborigines in Australia and then the early migrants to the Americas.

But later, with the agricultural revolution, things changed.

I liken it to the sea-change in European countries’ fortunes after 1492 and 1495 — until that point in time the countries on the Mediterranean basin like Genoa, Venice etc. were rich. But then the Atlantic facing countries got rich


54 posted on 04/20/2023 1:30:14 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson