Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul backed by GOP donor with $33B TikTok stake
NY Post ^ | Apr 6, 20223 | Lydia Moynihan

Posted on 04/07/2023 3:56:31 AM PDT by tlozo

Sen. Rand Paul’s heated opposition to a TikTok ban startled Capitol Hill last week, but you could look at it as a straightforward case of following the money, according to insiders – in this case, the money of a major GOP donor who has $33 billion on the line.

The gentleman from Kentucky – who has made his career partly as a China hawk – surprised colleagues on the Senate floor last week when he blocked Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley’s hopes for fast-tracked legislation to ban TikTok.

“Speech is protected whether you like it or not,” Rand said, jumping on Hawley’s proposal as soon as he stopped speaking. “Have faith that our desire for freedom is strong enough to survive a few dance videos.”

Sources claim credit for Paul’s impassioned speech should go to GOP mega donor Jeffrey Yass.

The billionaire CEO of Susquehanna Financial Group has given Paul more than $10 million since 2020, according to election filings.

His fund also owns a 15% stake in TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, that’s worth an estimated $33 billion.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bytedance; china; hada; jeffreyyass; joshhawley; paul; pauldonors; porn; prc; randpaul; republicandonors; sfg; thebozo; tiktok; yass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: McGruff
She must be a Chinese agent also.

Thanks for commenting, before reading article, as no one has accused Rand Paul of being a "Chinese agent".

21 posted on 04/07/2023 5:36:06 AM PDT by tlozo (Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

The government is already doing it.


22 posted on 04/07/2023 5:38:49 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

FB does everything TiK Tok does


23 posted on 04/07/2023 5:39:30 AM PDT by roving (👌⚓)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

This bill sucks. That great Republican Senator Thune (disappointment in greek I think) is a cosponsor — need I say more.?


24 posted on 04/07/2023 5:39:41 AM PDT by KC Burke (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity is not another way to spell GOD but it is a way to spell DIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: roving
FB does everything TiK Tok does

Yes. Difference is that Tiktok is owned by the Chinese. That's why Tiktok is banned on all federal government-owned devices.

25 posted on 04/07/2023 5:44:48 AM PDT by tlozo (Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tlozo
Debate is whether Tiktok should be banned.

You sir are OBTUSE - No, the debate is NOT about banning TickityTok.

The Debate is about the new law proposed by the UNIPARTY and they are using TickittyTock as the COVER story for the Dumb amongst us.

Yes, that would be you

26 posted on 04/07/2023 6:11:27 AM PDT by DanZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

“Debate is whether Tiktok should be banned. Ron Paul says he is against banning Tiktok, before the bill was presented.”

And there is the Freudian slip. The deep set hate for Ron Paul is driving you to also hate his son Rand Paul.

As a Paultard I can tell you with authority that both Ron and Rand have always opposed banning ANY free speech on ANY platform and in ANY form their whole careers.

Protecting free speech without compromise is what the Pauls have ALWAYS done.


27 posted on 04/07/2023 6:17:09 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DanZ

Once again, Ron Paul is against banning Tiktok, period. No matter what bill is written, even if it exclusively bans only Tiktok.


28 posted on 04/07/2023 6:26:17 AM PDT by tlozo (Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind
And there is the Freudian slip. The deep set hate for Ron Paul

Sorry, being older I just remember Ron more than Rand.

29 posted on 04/07/2023 6:27:57 AM PDT by tlozo (Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tlozo
Once again, Ron Paul is against banning Tiktok, period. No matter what bill is written, even if it exclusively bans only Tiktok.

I had hoped that you were simply obtuse.

Now I will have to assume you are a Commy FBI agent who, with time on your hands, having had the experience of working in D.C as one of the J6 provacoturs, has decided to do additional instigation on this site.

Were your daddy and granddaddy KGB operatives, is this where you learned how to be so obtuse?

30 posted on 04/07/2023 6:45:52 AM PDT by DanZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DanZ

Thanks for the enlightening debate.


31 posted on 04/07/2023 6:48:31 AM PDT by tlozo (Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

Yikes!


32 posted on 04/07/2023 6:52:25 AM PDT by NetAddicted (MAGA2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

“Sorry, being older I just remember Ron more than Rand.”

Of course, that is exactly what I stated. And it has made your judgment Pre-biased.


33 posted on 04/07/2023 7:05:26 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

Before I knew Jeff Yass was funding the Paul’s, I noted how Paul’s argument was not consistent with his normally logical and fact based arguments.


34 posted on 04/07/2023 7:14:31 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

That article is deceptively titled for sure.
This legislation that Senator Paul is opposing is just more Patriot Act and FISA court stuff.
We should be getting rid of bad laws, not making more bad laws.
I think most of you know what I mean.


35 posted on 04/07/2023 7:37:23 AM PDT by Honest Nigerian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Before I knew Jeff Yass was funding the Paul’s, I noted how Paul’s argument was not consistent with his normally logical and fact based arguments.
*****************************
I hear ya.... Oh wait. How is he being illogical and inconsistent? Because you jumped the shark with your claim.
I guess you have a blind spot, and we would like to help you see it. (Or maybe you can help us see ours?)


36 posted on 04/07/2023 7:43:40 AM PDT by Honest Nigerian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

So you think Paul opposes the bill because the Chinese pay them. I don’t believe the Pauls are paid Chinese agents. They had the same public position since Nixon was president.


37 posted on 04/07/2023 7:55:24 AM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Honest Nigerian

I ha e read a breakdown of what this law will empower the Feds to do. The law is a vast over reach and gives blanket powers to the Feds. Vast Deep State over reach — tagging it after the TikTok hearings was just an excuse. Hooray for Rand Paul even if I’m not a Libertarian Paul supporter


38 posted on 04/07/2023 11:05:50 AM PDT by KC Burke (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity is not another way to spell GOD but it is a way to spell DIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson