[rexthecat]

Relax everyone. This ruling was made because the Supreme Court didn't want to interfere with a case that is currently working its way through the court system. It is not a blanket ruling that legitimizes trans athletes. The Supreme Court will likely take that up once the case has been adjudicated by lower courts.

[thefactor]

Stop injecting logic into this emotional argument. People want to be angry and they will not be denied! Let them read only the headline and think the world is falling apart!!! Don’t you know how the media works?!?!

[TheDon]

In the meantime girls are deprived of their rights.

[Leaning Right]

> This ruling was made because the Supreme Court didn’t want to interfere with a case that is currently working its way through the court system. <

I see your point. But this ruling is denying real females the right to fair competition.

Would the Supreme Court be so hands-off if, say, some black athlete was being denied the right to fair competition? I don’t think so.

[CedarDave]

Relax everyone. This ruling was made because the Supreme Court didn't want to interfere with a case that is currently working its way through the court system. It is not a blanket ruling that legitimizes trans athletes. The Supreme Court will likely take that up once the case has been adjudicated by lower courts.

Exactly my thought. Not an emergency and not "ripe" for SCOTUS action. On the other hand, when he enters puberty, even with hormone blockers, and has to wear a jock strap, it would become an emergency as his presence in sports would overcome female performance.