Posted on 04/04/2023 1:04:21 PM PDT by cotton1706
Counts are AFTER Trump was sworn in as President, when he was running the country, not his business.
What a joke.
(Excerpt) Read more at manhattanda.org ...
http://www.newyorklegalethics.com/letters-of-engagement-are-now-mandatory/
seems like it is the attorney’s responsibiility to sign a retainer agreement not the client..
That is correct.
My point is the Trump ledger entry has to be false.
I think the prosecutor wants to argue this was “really” a payment to Stormy Daniels.
Or even just that it wasn’t a “retainer”.
I don’t think the ledger entry was false just because it used the word “retainer”. It was in fact a payment to Cohen, not to Daniels.
i dont know how prosecutor comes to conclusion it was false..he needs to explain that..
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, MADE AND CAUSED A FALSE ENTRY in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.
Trump Revocable Trust Account check and check stub dated February 14, 2017, bearing check
number 000138, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
UPON RESEARCH ONE OF THE ENTITIES DONALD TRUMP RESIGNED FROM JANUARY 19 2017, WAS THE DONALD J TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST (SEE LAST PAGE EXHIBIT A 3rd from bottom)HOW COULD HE HAVE MADE THE ENTRY, ANY Witnesses??????
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/3404759/DJT-Resignation-Signature-Page-With-Exhibit-a.pdf
https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2982&context=clevstlrev
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqJquS0X3aU&ab_channel=TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz
My legal analysis of the indictment
The Dershow With Alan Dershowitz
Apr 4, 2023
31m:16s
Just because I have a car restored in late 2016 doesn’t mean I don’t pay for it in 2017.
There was no crime. If President Trump actually HAD spent campaign money on the stormy daniels case THAT would have been a campaign finance violation. He did not spend campaign money. He spent his OWN money on the Daniels Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). An NDA is perfectly legal.
Their motive was the Plea Bargain. Attempting a fishing guilt.
Not gonna happen.
Now they’re going to fish fish and fish and micro fish.
We’re voting Trump before this
And millions more now because of this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.