Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Says Biden Administration May Have Violated First Amendment by Colluding With Big Tech
Daily Signal ^ | 3/20/23 | Harold Hutchison

Posted on 03/20/2023 2:19:17 PM PDT by CFW

A federal judge ruled against the Biden administration’s efforts to dismiss a case involving online censorship Monday, saying that the states of Missouri and Louisiana had “plausibly alleged” First Amendment violations.

United States District Judge Terry A. Doughty of the Western District of Louisiana denied the Biden administration’s motion to dismiss a suit brought on May 5 by Republican Attorneys General Erik Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana. Schmitt and Landry said the Biden administration colluded with social media companies to censor debate on multiple issues, including the 2020 presidential election and the COVID-19 pandemic.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: biden; bigtech; censorship; terryadoughty; trumpjudge; wdlouisiana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: CFW

So what’s the punishment if this is confirmed and they are found guilty?


21 posted on 03/20/2023 3:19:57 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

He signed an agreement, prior to accepting his plea bargain. Buried in the fine print was a portion which indicated the government may have exculpatory evidence which it had yet to disclose, and waiving that issue was part of the plea bargain. The only possibility he (the viking guy) has of getting out of jail, is having the agreement voided by the court because his counsel ineffectively represented him. It is an extremely difficult thing to prove.


22 posted on 03/20/2023 3:24:16 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Civil damages. Whatever amount of money you can convince a jury to award you. Probably enough to put them all in the poorhouse. Gigure several mil, as there will likely be punitive damages imposed.


23 posted on 03/20/2023 3:27:39 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CFW

MAY have???


24 posted on 03/20/2023 3:29:00 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krogers58

Them personally or the Gov’t just prints more money to pay it?


25 posted on 03/20/2023 3:37:27 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Corrupt and unconstitutional policies.

Indeed some judges understand what the democrats have in mind for the courts the central committee will take charge of them.


26 posted on 03/20/2023 3:54:27 PM PDT by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
May have?

Slow down there hot rod. The case has not gone to court yet. For the judge to imply otherwise would force him to reuse from the case.

This is a win. At least the judge did not say that the AGs lack standing as is generally the case.

27 posted on 03/20/2023 4:09:57 PM PDT by usurper (AI was born with a birth defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

“So what’s the punishment if this is confirmed and they are found guilty?”

___

Hubby and I discuss that issue often. There is no punishment for a government employee or politician who violates a person’s constitutional rights. Any finding by the Court that a violation has occurred may result in a fine or a reversal of a law, but the person themselves never suffer from the harm they cause. Any fine is paid by the taxpayers and the offenders are free to continue with their unlawful actions.

We need personal responsibility for those in government that violate a person’s Constitutional rights.


28 posted on 03/20/2023 4:53:40 PM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Wasn’t this $#!& going on during the Trump administration? Seems we remember Faucu and others were doing this. Heck, the secret channels into “soycial meateater companies” available to the FBI were running before 2021.


29 posted on 03/20/2023 5:00:04 PM PDT by Honest Nigerian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

May have must be judge speak for he’s guilty as hell.


30 posted on 03/20/2023 5:09:35 PM PDT by Vision (Woke is communism and it has no place in America. Election Reform Now! Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Them personally or the Gov’t just prints more money to pay it?

I believe the US Government will represent them, and that any judgments may be paid by the DOJ, but maybe the Republican congress could deny said payment. For unlawful conduct, it is usually a given that the individuals are liable, but things have changed. It is unclear who, to me, who would pay this.
31 posted on 03/20/2023 5:22:25 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Absolutely no question the federal government committed numerous violations of the first amendment. They had no business whatsoever telling any companies who to ban, censor, etc.


32 posted on 03/20/2023 5:40:37 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
voting harder won’t change that.

Jim, Sadly I believe that you are 100% correct.....

33 posted on 03/20/2023 6:22:13 PM PDT by eeriegeno (Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

34 posted on 03/21/2023 2:47:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson