Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tesla’s Plans For Zero Rare Earth Electric Vehicle Motor Could Undermine Beijing’s Secret Weapon
Epoch Times ^ | 03/17/2023 | Anne Zhang and Olivia Li

Posted on 03/17/2023 10:08:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

News Analysis

At its 2023 Investor Day presentation in Texas, Tesla revealed its plans to produce its next generation EV motor without any rare earth minerals. As a global leader in the electric vehicle market, Tesla’s plan for zero rare earth permanent magnet motors, if successful, could have a significant impact on the rare earth market—particularly China’s rare earth monopoly.

“As the world transitions to clean energy, the demand for rare earths is really increasing dramatically, and not only will it be a little harder to meet that demand, but mining rare earths has environmental and health risks,” said Colin Campbell, VP of Powertrain Engineering at Tesla.

“We have designed our next drive unit, which uses a permanent magnet motor, to not use any rare earth materials at all,” he announced.

Currently, Tesla’s Model Y uses three types of rare earth materials: approximately 500 grams of one, and 10 grams of two others. But in Tesla’s next generation permanent magnet motor, zero rare earths will be used, according to Campbell’s presentation.

Campbell did not specify which materials would be used to replace the rare earth components.

Tesla also stated that from 2017 to 2022, its use of rare earth materials in the Tesla Model 3 had decreased by 25 percent due to improved efficiency in its powertrain system.

Shortly after Tesla’s announcement to remove rare earths from its EVs motors, China’s largest rare earth supplier, Northern Rare Earth (600111.SHA), saw its stock price drop by nearly 10 percent as of March 10. The stock prices of two other major rare earth suppliers, China Rare Earth (0769.HKG) and Shenghe Resources (600392.SHA), also fell by 5.9 percent and 10 percent, respectively.

Compared with the traditional excitation generators, permanent magnet motors—especially rare earth permanent magnet motors—have higher magnetic energy product and coercive force: the ability to resist demagnetization. This makes them reliable and highly efficient. The energy conversion efficiency of rare earth permanent magnet motors typically reaches 90 percent, with the best achieving over 98 percent.

However, the supply of rare earths has been highly monopolized by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). According to data released this year by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), in 2022, China’s rare earth reserves accounted for 34 percent of the world’s known reserves, and its rare earth production accounts for 70 percent of global production. As a result, the supply and price of rare earths in the global market are largely under the control of the CCP.

In addition, the supply of rare earths may not keep pace with the rapid expansion of the global EV market, especially Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets, a key component in advanced electric motors.

In the wake of heightened tensions between the United States and China, minimizing or eliminating the use of rare earth elements without affecting product performance would be beneficial to supply chain stability.

Zero Rare Earth Technology May Have Wide Impact

In 2022, Tesla delivered more than 1.31 million EVs, accounting for 18.2 percent of the global EV market and ranking first in the world. Since 2018, Tesla has taken over more than 60 percent market share of the American EV market. In Europe, Tesla’s Model Y and Model 3 were the two most popular EVs in 2022.

This dominant position gives Tesla tremendous influence in the EV industry.

According to rare earth consulting firm Adamas Intelligence, EV motors account for 12 percent of global consumption of NdFeB magnets, of which Tesla accounts for 15 percent to 20 percent.

If Tesla succeeds in removing rare earths from its motors, Adamas estimates that the global market for NdFeB will lose only 2 to 3 percent of demand in the short term. However, in the long term, it is estimated to lose 3 to 4 percent at most, assuming Tesla can maintain its leadership position in the EV market.

But this analysis did not take into account that other EV companies will likely follow suit if Tesla is successful, as this innovation has cost-saving potential and helps to rid industry reliance on the vulnerable and costly rare earth supply chain.

In addition to new energy vehicles, rare earth permanent magnet motors are also used in several other areas, including wind turbines, traditional automotive motors, home appliances that use frequency conversion technology (air conditioners, refrigerators, washing machines, etc.), industrial robots, and energy-saving elevators. Therefore, the development of zero rare earth permanent magnet motor technology may have broader implications, potentially affecting demand for rare earths from China.

CCP’s Secret Weapon

The CCP sees rare earths as a political bargaining chip.

In 2010, after China escalated its sovereignty dispute with Japan over the Diaoyu Islands, the CCP began restricting the export of all 17 rare earth materials to Japan as a means of coercion. This move alerted Western countries to the risks of relying on Chinese supply chains.

The CCP has been establishing a so-called rare earth strategic reserve system since 2011, treating rare earths as strategic resources, and collecting and stockpiling large amounts of rare earth raw materials.

At the same time, through a quota system that controls the total volume of rare earth mining and smelting in China, the CCP has concentrated rare earth production in the hands of a few government-controlled rare earth groups, further strengthening its control over global rare earth supply and prices.

Beijing began seriously considering rare earth export restriction to the United States in May 2019, amid the escalation of U.S.-China trade war.

“Since the United States announced its decision to include Huawei on its ‘Entity List’, speculation has been rife that China may restrict or even stop its exports of rare earths to the United States,” the CCP’s mouthpiece Global Times warned in a May 2019 article. “We believe that if the White House continues to intensify its pressure on China, it may only be a matter of time before China wields rare earths as a weapon.”

Around the same time, People’s Daily also issued a harsh warning, saying that the United States “should not underestimate China’s ability to counteract.”



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; ev; rareearth; tesla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: DoughtyOne

“Lithium is recognized as bad, and it is probably already on its way out.”

The article is about ingredients for the magnets in the motors, none of which are lithium. The lithium is in the batteries.

The article says mere grams of the rare-earth elements are used in current motors and the elements are not described as pollutants.


21 posted on 03/17/2023 11:19:56 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

Tesla needs a bigger aluminum casting machine to build the cyber truck frame all in one piece. That is what is holding up production. The Italian company that built the machines that cast the car frames is making an even larger machine to cast the truck frame in a one piece uni-body.

This is the key to speeding up the manufacturing process.


22 posted on 03/17/2023 11:24:25 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Labor will be reduced when they start building the smaller vehicles in Monterrey, MEXICO.
This is where the newest gigafactory is being built.


23 posted on 03/17/2023 11:26:05 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

EV’s are a solution looking for a problem.


24 posted on 03/17/2023 11:26:42 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

Who’s going to want to work in Mexico, a crime-ridden country,and where, if you are employed, you have money, and that money invites criminals.

Relationship with Mexico is going downhill, with the border crisis and the fentanyl crisis and where control of the government is by the criminal cartes.

That battery factory may get closed as soon as it’s built.


25 posted on 03/17/2023 11:43:50 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: POWG

Question: who makes the robots, and are the robots maintained by other robots, and are they cheap and breakdown-proof?

Labor is everywhere in a factory, and even robots require labor from humans.


26 posted on 03/17/2023 11:46:20 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Won't ever happen, no matter what the hype currently or the marketing.
Prices of all components and materials and labor go up, not down.

You are missing the point of Tesla and how they build cars. They build cars like no other company, focusing on how the factory operates in order to reduce costs of building cars.

They have huge profit margins, and can continue dropping prices to market a $25,000 EV. The traditional ICE producers like GM and Ford lose money on every EV they sell, while Tesla can make up to $20,000 on each one - they plow the profits into expanding their factories.

Tesla is employing parallel building, while other companies use hundred-year-old assembly line practices. The old way is to have cars move on a single assembly line where parts are assembled, then later disassembled, while paint and other operations are done, then reassembled with a lot of wasted effort and idle employees. In parallel building, multiple assembly lines concentrate on different areas like front, sides, rear, bottom and top with little wasted effort and then all are integrated at the end. For instance, the floor is built as a single unit with battery pack, carpeting and seats, and then raised into the body at the end. The rear and front are built from single castings and have motors, electronics and drive train installed. The body is built separately, assembled and painted. All of it merges at the end. No other ICE company is doing this.

All while Tesla reduces weight, increases efficiency, and reduces costs. Not only of the car components, but reduces labor and materials and robots. Their factories are efficiently built.

27 posted on 03/17/2023 11:56:26 AM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revel

That and copper, among other things.


28 posted on 03/17/2023 12:09:28 PM PDT by fretzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: adorno

You do realize that GM and Toyota and several other auto companies have been making vehicles in Mexico for 25+ years.
Every since NAFTA.


29 posted on 03/17/2023 12:20:00 PM PDT by woodbutcher1963 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: adorno

I’m not sure I understand your question. Tesla isn’t using 600 robots to make the castings - they eliminated the need for 600 robots. So the savings affect everything: Cost of the robots, the factory space, the electricity, and all the human labor to operate everything. The casting machines are the size of a house and cost like $10,000,000 but that is much less than 600 of the other robots.


30 posted on 03/17/2023 12:33:01 PM PDT by POWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: adorno

The Tesla factory in Mexico will by built and operated by local workers. There may be a few supervisors and engineers from the U.S but I doubt that would be a large number. I would think that one of the main reasons to build a factory in Mexico would be to take advantage of very capable Mexican labor.


31 posted on 03/17/2023 12:48:18 PM PDT by POWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963
You do realize that GM and Toyota and several other auto companies have been making vehicles in Mexico for 25+ years.

I'm aware, and Mexico has been getting a lot more of the manufacturing from the U.S, and not just autos.

But, things in Mexico are not the same as they were 25 years ago.
32 posted on 03/17/2023 1:50:35 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Whatever the economies for building Teslas, they will always be expensive to own. We were promised $35,000 to $40,000 per vehicle for Teslas about 8-10 years ago, and those vehicles ended up costing around $70,000-$75,000. So no, won’t believe a $$25,000 or $30,000 Tesla until it hits the market at those prices. I believe the promise last week was for $25,000 but now, it’s $30,000. I have no doubt that that price will jump to $50,000 or more by the time it hits the market.


33 posted on 03/17/2023 1:57:21 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

“Tesla is employing parallel building, while other companies use hundred-year-old assembly line practices.“

What companies specifically are using 100 yr old assembly line practices? Anything I’ve heard from any company since the robots started in indicates that the straight assembly line is long gone. Parallel/robot is being used by other companies than Tesla. Who’s not using it?


34 posted on 03/17/2023 2:54:08 PM PDT by TalBlack (We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack
Parallel/robot is being used by other companies than Tesla. Who’s not using it?

Everyone other than Tesla. Can you cite other companies building cars with single casting rear and front frames? Or building integrated battery floors that are integral parts of the mid-frame? And the list goes on, where these components are merged together at the end of the assembly process. No other manufacturer is doing this. All manufacturers are using robots. What Tesla is doing is to eliminate many robots with their builds.

35 posted on 03/17/2023 5:42:51 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Whatever the economies for building Teslas, they will always be expensive to own.

Have you priced offerings from other makers, for example GM and Ford? $100,000 for EV offerings from them. GM and Ford EV's will always be expensively using similar logic.

Yes, there's a lot of hype about Tesla. No different than the bs hype from Mary Barra at GM. Lots of promises from GM, no delivery. Just expensive Hummers and Lyriqs, if you can find one. The difference is that Tesla can deliver on the hype for a $25,000 EV in the next few years, and still make a profit. I do think EVs are too expensive, but don't single out Tesla on that. They're all expensive at this time. People with lots of spare money are the buyers.

36 posted on 03/17/2023 5:51:55 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

CATL is the biggest battery manufacturer and they appear to be pushing forward with the sodium ion batteries despite only 80-90% (their claims) of the energy density of the lithium ion technology.

It will be a good trade-off because the cost of cobalt, nickel, and I believe lithium have risen 1500% in the past decade so economics is going to be the primary driver for different batteries.

From an environmental standpoint the sodium ion batteries are MUCH better than lithium ion. They are also far safer (fire).

Realistically, most EV drivers will be fine with a cheaper sodium ion battery because almost all EV usage is local commutes so “range” is not really the top priority outside of car magazines and YouTubers.


37 posted on 03/17/2023 6:03:35 PM PDT by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
Have you priced offerings from other makers

Yes I have, and for anything worth having, they are all very expensive. It's not just a Tesla thing. Tesla may be the best known EV maker, but it's still just as expensive as the other makers of EVs from the luxury brands. All EVs worth having, are now in the luxury price field.
38 posted on 03/17/2023 6:03:42 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: adorno
All EVs worth having, are now in the luxury price field.

I know lots of people that would like to buy an EV, but simply can't afford one within their budget. Others brag about having bought an EV, and say they're saving money on not having to buy gasoline; which is a lie because they bought a $100,000 EV. Regular folks will buy ICE vehicles up to $30,000, because that's what they can afford. So ICE is going to be around for many years despite libs mandating the end of ICE sales by 2030 or 2035. Just plain stupid. Government should just let the free market decide what people will buy, and end dumb regulations.

39 posted on 03/17/2023 6:23:17 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
Back in the late 90s to early 2000s Ben and Harold Rosen were working on a flywheel generator to power cars. Harold figured out geostationary orbit for satellites and Ben was a big mover at Compaq, neither of them slouches. Rosen Motors tried for years to find a major manufacturer partner but none wanted to outsource their powertrain.

Link

I have no doubt Musk could perfect this tech and he already has the vehicles to deploy it. It’s likely available at a reasonable price too.

40 posted on 03/17/2023 7:03:24 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson