Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC

My rule of thumb on that is if we’re talking about arming
those nations to the teeth, or if we are simply offering
them light arms and the promise to come to their aid if
they are attacked.

The Ukraine was not a serious threat to Russia. If it had
been, Russia wouldn’t have marched to within seven miles
of downtown KEIV. It wouldn’t have gotten across the
border at all.

Nah, I’m not buying what’s been peddled on this forum.


59 posted on 03/03/2023 8:45:07 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for? which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Really, NATO itself was never configured, armed, or funded to fight much more than a defensive war. Some punch-backs here and there, sure, but a push to Moscow? No way. Take and hold significant swaths or Russian territory? Again, no way. And certainly not after the Clinton years.

Unfortunately, this prediction from 1994 came true:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og0X3-lDQts

(3 minute vid.)


65 posted on 03/05/2023 6:52:56 AM PST by Paul R. (You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson