Posted on 02/22/2023 2:18:57 PM PST by conservative98
Pres. Trump continues to show the difference between a “Peoples’ President and a “Political Party’s President.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That’s because President Trump, as far as political ideology is concerned, is a Populist not an ideological Republican. And if the average citizen ever manages to understand what Populism is all about the ‘rats and the RINOs will finally be exposed for their deep animosity and disrespect for the average American.
The Biden Administration has sent several loads of bullshit.
He lost by 10 million votes in 2020.
Reagan won by 10 million votes.
Facts speak for themselves.
- - - - - - -
Different voters.
Another example of where the perfect is the enemy of the good.
Reagan won New York and Massachussetts They won’t vote for him today.
Whatever Trump lacks in political skills, he more than makes it up in genuine love of ordinary Americans and Vets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Exactly. Even though he’s a very wealthy man, at heart he identifies naturally with people from all walks of life. In that sense he’s politically a perfect Populist candidate for President. And if ever the average voter understands the difference between Populism and the guiding principles of the two major parties, it’s going to trigger a major political realignment in this country.
Trump brings water to those in need, Biden gives your Social Security to Ukraine/
Is it true that the residents of the town welcomed him with “USA USA USA”
Pres. Trump continues to show the difference between a “Peoples’ President and a “Political Party’s President.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
President Trump demonstrates that being wealthy and being a Populist are not mutually exclusive.
Trump must answer for the support he has provided the jab
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I support the right of all people to choose for themselves whether or not to to be vaccinated. Some in my family have been vaccinated while others, myself included, have declined to do so. President Trump’s support for the vaccinations has been shared by a very large percentage of American citizens who have suffered no adverse consequences, and have avoided being infected with the virus. And I’m sure President Trump believes that based on those results his support for the vaccinations was the right thing to do.
Which is why I will vote for him 3rd time.
And I will Vote for him a forth time too. One in the Primary and one in the national election.
Ron DeSantis
Where does Jeb come into this? The RINOs are all in on the jab. Where is the responsibility to protect the citizens? Trump tried to build a wall, Trump tried to put human traffickers on notice. Trump knows how to deal with China (put them in their place). Trump revealed the evil that exists in our government and society. Still, a tremendous failure on the jab when he had people BROUGHT IN to fight the CDC machinations to lock us down! He refused to listen or was easily swayed from listening. My opinion, the issue was too complicated for the general public to absorb the consequences and Trump would not bother dragging himself through that even though he would allow the deep state to fight him till his last day in office. He knows marketing and salesmanship; he got used by his own hubris in those areas. what will be different if he is in there again?
Unfortunately, the method that the vaccination was implemented violated all medical procedures for implementing a vaccine. regardless if the vaccine worked (which is proven it doesn’t). The facts were there for him to ponder. mRNA technology is not something new. It has been a failure as a vaccine for decades. The results you speak to have hidden the fact of how many people were truly injured by the vaccine and also deaths. There have been many vaccines in the past 50 years that were deemed dangerous with far less negative results in testing than the jabs. Now they are admitting it is affecting women in child bearing years and let’s look at excess deaths in the 18-35 year olds since implementing the jab. The shame of it is that this was predicted when it was determined an mRNA vaccine was going to be developed.
Would it be considered acceptable if no more than 10% of the jabbed were injured or killed by getting it. Not to mention those required to take it by coercion of the government? Where was Trump to speak out against that? Hell, just say something! He wasn’t forcing it, but he sure as hell didn’t speak against the behavior (that I am aware).
BTW, I’m still waiting for him to deliver water to the Jan 6th detainees.
Actually, only TRUMP can defeat TRUMP! He needs to stop the Childish name calling.
Good on Legit President Trump!
Trump must answer for the support he has provided the jab -
WRONG see the states ruling the country is the United states not the presidents states.
Those confined for Jan 6 is all the democrats doing they had the house senate and the WH go lean on them for the answer.
Low energy Jeb worked great in 2016.
Lying Ted worked great in 2016.
Why should Trump change a proven method of winning nomination.
Because Ron Desantis is NOT Sanctimonious. He;s our ONLY hope if Trump drops off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.