Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

“By Federal Elections he means any candidate that is either a US House Member or Senator.”

But the feds don’t run those elections, the states do. So, yeah, it’s not really a “nitpick”, but a serious problem with any proposal that the feds are going to be able to do anything about those elections.


13 posted on 02/22/2023 4:58:47 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
But the feds don’t run those elections, the states do. So, yeah, it’s not really a “nitpick”, but a serious problem with any proposal that the feds are going to be able to do anything about those elections.

No, it's a nitpick because the Constitution gives Congress the ability to legislate "Federal" elections, or, in other words, any elections that involve federal level candidates.
14 posted on 02/22/2023 5:01:04 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson