Posted on 02/22/2023 8:05:27 AM PST by Red Badger
During the 2022 election cycle, the military records of Republican candidates were repeatedly attacked and called in to question by Democratic opponents and PAC’s.
Very few people publicly questioned how the military records, which are supposed to remain confidential unless the requester goes through the proper legal channels, were released.
In one particularly egregious case, Democrat opposition research firm Due Diligence Group LLC outed veteran and Republican Congressional candidate Jennifer-Ruth Green as a victim of sexual assault, resulting in widespread backlash from both Republicans and Democrats alike.
According to an Air Force spokesperson, the records were released as a result of Democratic opposition researchers lying and saying that they were requesting the records for an employment background check.
The opposition research firm was reportedly paid $110,000 by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) over a nearly two-year period.
National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) Chairman Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) called for the Democrat’s respective committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), to face accountability following a bombshell report from Politico revealing a research firm employed by the DCCC inappropriately obtained the military personnel files of multiple Republicans.
“This systematic weaponization of Republican candidates’ military service against them is beyond disgusting. It is time for the DCCC to stop hiding and face accountability for their actions,” Hudson said in a statement, referring to the Politico report indicating the military personnel files of Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE) and Zach Nunn (R-IA) had been obtained using a “stolen” Social Security Number in at least one instance.
“The Department of Justice must immediately begin investigations into this matter, and if the DCCC violated the law, they should face prosecution,” the NRCC chairman added.
Politico noted that the “DCCC did not return a request for comment on whether it received and used materials provided by Due Diligence Group during the 2022 midterms.”
If I were at Camp X during an operation that resulted in the elimination of a high-value target, and the IIS sought revenge, they might request my records to confirm my presence before targeting me.
This has occurred before, as in the case of a Navy Officer in California, if I recall correctly. To safeguard our families, records should only verify our service, not our job or deployments.
Therefore, it’s best to keep our DD-214 forms securely locked away and not on file with the county or any other organization. Some counties offer a service to store DD-214 forms, but it’s advisable to avoid this option.
Lucky for democrats their butt boys at the Washington Post and New York Times will protect them.
Maybe 51 ‘intelligence’ thugs will publish a letter next saying it’s not true. Democrat filth and corruption will get a pass as always.
Because they're corrupt thugs and totalitarians?
It’s all about being victorious!
Hi, I’m a looking to hire Mrs. X for a job and I need to know if she was ever sexually assaulted.
Sure. That sounds like a reasonable request.
- nobody ever.
I’m ok with details characterizing any candidate’s military service, like the stuff contained in a DD214, being publicly available. I’m not sure how you square the circle with what happened to Jennifer-Ruth Green.
For democrats and other totalitarians the ends justify the means. All of us know that about democrats - they’re the scum of the earth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.