Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7

No recoil! Amazing!


34 posted on 02/21/2023 3:24:41 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

No ball used, just powder. They are liberals trying hard.


38 posted on 02/21/2023 4:48:44 AM PST by Candor7 ( ( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“No recoil! Amazing!” [Lonesome in Massachusetts, post 34]

Beyond amazing; physically impossible.

Blank charges generate some recoil, but only a little compared to a live round: total mass ejected from the gun barrel would be only a tiny fraction of that when a live round is fired.

Heavy blank charges generate perceptible recoil in some guns. Standard powder charge for the US M1795 musket (69 cal) was 186 grains - about half the weight of a 7.62mm NATO round. Charge the pan, pour the rest down the barrel, ram the cartridge paper on top of it. When you touch it off you know it.

Your post #42 on the NYT retraction was excellent, and still relevant decades after. I’ve met folks possessed of multiple advanced degrees and commercial pilot ratings, who still cannot believe a rocket will work in outer space, because “there’s nothing to push against.” Some of those degrees were in aeronautics.


45 posted on 02/21/2023 4:19:40 PM PST by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson