Posted on 02/10/2023 10:49:24 AM PST by Twotone
Two former employees of a major liberal dark money group say they were subjected to racism and discrimination in the workplace, according to wrongful termination lawsuits obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
Both suits allege that the New Venture Fund, a dominant player in Democratic politics that operates a network of liberal organizations, paid black women less than white counterparts, and that black employees risked being fired for pushing back against discrimination. One employee, hired as a racial equity consultant, said she was "subjected to racial harassment" and frequently shouted down by white colleagues during discussions about race.
The liberal dark money behemoth claims to "fearlessly" integrate the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion in all its work. The allegations, from employees at separate New Venture Fund affiliates, implicate senior executives and suggest the group's stated commitment to racial "equity" does not extend to its black employees.
The group raised $964 million in 2021 alone from mostly anonymous donors. It used those funds to bankroll hundreds of left-wing entities and operate hundreds more "pop-up" groups. The New Venture Fund is the largest branch of the Arabella Advisors network, the country’s predominant dark money network that raked in a staggering $1.6 billion to finance left-wing causes in 2021.
Both lawsuits accuse New Venture Fund of systematically paying black women less than their white counterparts, and claim minorities risked termination if they dared to blow the whistle on the group's internal racism. The most recent claim comes from Francesca Weaks, who filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against New Venture Fund on Jan. 31. Weaks worked as a racial equity consultant for a New Venture Fund "pop-up" group called the Local Solutions Support Center.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
The pious and sanctimonious left can scarcely conceal its hypocrisy. They are so persuaded by the nobility of their cause that behavior they accuse others of is morally justified when they indulge in it. The question becomes where do they draw the line of restraint, or do they draw a line at all?
Well this will be fun
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.