Why are you asking me what intelligence the “weather balloon” gathered? It wasn’t my balloon. Are you implying that if I don’t know what intelligence it gathered then it must not have gathered any? I don’t understand why you’re going to such lengths to promote the CCP’s narrative.
I don’t understand why you’re going to such lengths to promote the CCP’s narrative
————
I don’t either.
No one is saying they know for sure what it was, but why do we have a couple of posters who are adamantly defending the idea that it’s only a weather balloon. Why is it ok to push that theory, but not ok to discuss other possibilities?