Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi Blasts GOP Claim She Set ‘Precedent’ To Kick Dems Off Committees: ‘We Said If You’re A Danger, You’re A Danger!’
Mediaite ^ | Jan 20, 2023 | Tommy Christopher

Posted on 01/20/2023 7:43:55 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi objected when CNN anchor Chris Wallace asked if she’d “opened the door” for Republicans to kick Democratic members of Congress Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and Ilhan Omar off of their committees......

WALLACE: Didn’t you open the door to this?

PELOSI: No, we set a precedent which I hope they will follow. If they have members, as they did, who threatened the security of our members on the committee or a danger to our members, threatening them, then they will go off the committee. So if they have that accusation about any of our members, let’s hear what they have to say. It was clear that their members were a threat to our members. So this is about maintaining safety for our members. The fact that they want to take these people off the committee is philosophical. So, they have the votes they could take somebody off, but that’s for philosophical reasons. That’s not the precedent that we set. We said if you’re a danger, you’re a danger. You can’t be on the committee.

WALLACE: They would say Ilhan Omar has made a number of anti-semitic comments, they’d say Eric Swalwell had a relationship of some sort with an alleged Chinese spy. Those are legitimate reasons to kick them off their commitees.

PELOSI: Well, that’s not — there’s not legitimate reasons. If they want to do that, then that’s the precedent they are setting, but don’t say it’s a precedent that we set. We said these people are a danger to the other members of the committee and they’re threatening manner and the rest, and that’s why they’re going off the committee, because they’re a danger.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; housecommittees; nancy; payback; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Who are we going to believe? Nancy or our lying common sense?
1 posted on 01/20/2023 7:43:55 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

All Democrats are a danger, thus we will keep them all off the committees!


2 posted on 01/20/2023 7:44:34 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

3 posted on 01/20/2023 7:47:14 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("There is no good government at all & none possible."--Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

A concise translation of Pelosi’s definition of “threatening manner” is “strongly disagreed with us”.


4 posted on 01/20/2023 7:48:13 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Of course, Wallace didn’t ask her in what specific way they were a “danger” to the sweet little dems. He just let her ramble this total nonesense.


5 posted on 01/20/2023 7:48:24 AM PST by dandiegirl (BOBBY m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I couldn’t get the clip to download.

So did Chris “low ratings” Wallace follow up, or did he let her skate?


6 posted on 01/20/2023 7:50:55 AM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Nancy Pelosi is the example of the perfect democrat...She is a lying anti-American POS....


7 posted on 01/20/2023 7:50:56 AM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
If they want to do that, then that’s the precedent they are setting, but don’t say it’s a precedent that we set. We said these people are a danger to the other members of the committee and they’re threatening manner and the rest, and that’s why they’re going off the committee, because they’re a danger.

Unfortunately only she is the judge of who is a danger. And when they stage a fake "insurrection" and then reps defend trespassers she labels them a "threat". So this is what you call word salad.

8 posted on 01/20/2023 7:51:01 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Karma is a witch. So is pecker puss Pelosi


9 posted on 01/20/2023 7:51:41 AM PST by DeplorablePaul (protesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Elections have consequences, Nancy.


10 posted on 01/20/2023 7:56:53 AM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“If they have members, as they did, who threatened the security of our members on the committee or a danger to our members, threatening them, then they will go off the committee.”

She threw everyone off of the Jan. 6th committee except to willing stooges? This makes no sense.


11 posted on 01/20/2023 7:57:51 AM PST by BushCountry (A properly cast vote (1 day voting) can save you $3.00 a gallon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The woman will lie about anything.


12 posted on 01/20/2023 8:03:31 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
The woman will lie about anything.

What is she still doing in Congress? Didn't her ambassadorship to Italy come thru yet?

13 posted on 01/20/2023 8:05:34 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So they are a danger if they are a member of a committee but not a danger if they are just a member of congress.

Mmmkay

Lying sack Pelosi


14 posted on 01/20/2023 8:07:15 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Vote Democrat and stay on the plantation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
It was clear that their members were a threat to our members. So this is about maintaining safety for our members.

Safety? Is that physical safety? That’s a delusion. It’s more likely that these snowflakes can’t handle hearing alternative perspectives. They need their safe spaces. I’m so tired of irrational fears. Over half of Americans are living in a self imposed prison of fear. People are afraid to speak their minds. People are afraid of offending and being offended. People still wear face diapers. They don’t work by the way. People are afraid of Russia when it’s proven their military is crap. People are afraid to create, build businesses, and live their dreams. Fear seems to be everywhere.

Wake up. Our so-called betters are using fear to control you and for them to expand their power. The next time you feel a twinge of fear, the do some research and a little critical thinking. Get off the emotional bus. The next big wave of fear is for the debt limit. It does not need to be feared. It doesn’t need to be increased. Congress can cut spending and government programs. They have only forgotten how too. There is nothing to fear.

15 posted on 01/20/2023 8:08:15 AM PST by ConservativeInPA (Stupidly is a moral problem, not an intellectual problem. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The biggest surprise to me is that Chris Wallace was saying these things to Queen Nancy.


16 posted on 01/20/2023 8:08:22 AM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

All Democrats are dangerous to the Republic and to the people.


17 posted on 01/20/2023 8:15:54 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Oh my a lot of things Nancy did are now coming back to them on the you know what ,LOL


18 posted on 01/20/2023 8:18:20 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
Oh my a lot of things Nancy did are now coming back to them on the you know what ,LOL

Similar to what Harry Reid did over in the Senate.

19 posted on 01/20/2023 8:19:54 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“PELOSI: Well, that’s not — there’s not legitimate reasons. If they want to do that, then that’s the precedent they are setting, but don’t say it’s a precedent that we set. We said these people are a danger to the other members of the committee and they’re threatening manner and the rest, and that’s why they’re going off the committee, because they’re a danger.”

Word salad. Hard to say if it’s stupidity, senility, or some combination of both.


20 posted on 01/20/2023 8:28:32 AM PST by The Antiyuppie (When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson