Posted on 01/15/2023 4:49:24 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Jan 15th, 2023
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Anchor Shannon Bream: Rep. Tony Gonzales (RINO-Texas); Arkansas Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders; Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.). Cornel West, Race Baiter; Dietrich Bonhoeffer chair at the Union Theological Seminary; and Robert George, director of Princeton University's James Madison Program in the American Ideals and Institutions, discuss "civil discourse”. Panel: Guy Benson, Olivia Beavers, Whine Williams and Horace Cooper.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Hosted by Chuck U. Toad: Russian Hoaxer and former deputy U.S. attorney general Rod Rosenstein; Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.); and Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.). Panel: Marc Short, former chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence; NBC News senior Washington correspondent Hallie Jackson; and MSNBC host Rev. Al Sharpton—just another easily forgotten group of angry Leftists slinging anti-American balderdash.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Margaret Brennan anchors: Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.); Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah); Lucius Outlaw, associate professor of Law at Howard University School of Law; Chris Whipple, author of "The Fight of His Life: Inside Joe Biden's White House"; Larry Pfeiffer, director of the Hayden Center at George Mason University; and former acting CIA director Michael Morell.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Hosted by Little Georgie Steponallofus: Sen. Raphael Warlock (D-Ga.) and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.). Panel: Former NJ R-Gov Chris Chrispie, former DNC chair and Hillary note giver Donna BrazileNut, Politico reporter Rachael Bade; and ABC News political director Rick Klein–more Fat RINOs and Left-wing Propagandists!
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Anchored by Jake Toe-Tapper: James Comer (R-Ky.), incoming chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability; Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), incoming ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability; and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). Panel: Scott Jennings, former special assistant to President George W. Bush; former Obama senior policy adviser Ashley Allison, former national coalitions director for the 2020 Biden presidential campaign; and Republican strategist Kristen Soltis Anderso—Tapper’s panel is usually made up of fruits and nuts!
SUNDAY MORNING FUTURES (FNC): The Show to watch! Hosted by Maria Bartiromo: House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee; journalist Matt Taibbi and Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.).
So the Republicans could pass a bill specifying how it works, and re-introduce it when the Republicans win the Senate again. At some point when common sense prevails, it becomes a law. Simple enough.
Of course they do, Bert!
But just to correct you, those apartment buildings are NOT barracks. They're apartments for military families, and of course those are dependents (civilian wives, husbands, kids) who are not subject to the UCMJ. Also, certain civil laws prevail upon the military landlord similar to civilian rule, such as restrictions on search and seizure as described in the 4th and 5th amendments of the Constitution.
Congress has no problem determining their fate or their renumeration, if any, for living in a high cost area do to their husbands/wives service. But as we used to say, "The Army/Air Force/Navy did NOT issue you a dependent, so suck it up! I'm sure those dependents tug their forelocks in honor and gratitude of and for their Congressional superiors.
Congress determines... That's kind of humorous.
Just like they've decided it is okay for them to be able to use insider information connected to their law making and testimony to them in order to be able to buy and sell stocks before the general public has access to the same information.
And I'm sure a host of other determinations they've decided (in their favor, of course).
It’s obvious... there are probably multiple scams like this to funnel money to ‘the big guy.’If only we possessed an agency that could investigate matters like this...
Weak. Ditto for Trump.
I’m afraid I didn’t make my point
Congress doesn’t want the DC housing you describe.
If they did, they could and might establish a 5 star residence hotel
yeah for sure we are the agency if we dont do it who will?
RE: MLK dream.
True.
Modern black academics often consider his ideas passe and outdated.
While he was alive Dr.King knew that his was one element only which had to depend upon the threat of violence from the others in order to succeed. I heard that at a lecture by a young black man at an MLK Day event at a university. He said without those others as counterpoints Dr.King would have failed.
Listen to the questions and the answers..in case you missed it.
Dr King a Republican?
He was an Edward Brooke/Dick Olgilvie Republican. Many small tent Freepers would deny that he was a “real” Republican. (A little IL angle there. I was active in his Chicago Westside area before and after MLK was there. While he was there, I was in Vietnam.
Many activists on the left did not welcome MLK. He did not cater to neither the Alinsky/Tom Gaudete nor Alinsky/Shell Trap nor Jesse Jackson nor Obama schools of organizing.
How long did it take before a majority of Black Alermen would support naming a street after him?
How many FReepers today do not agree with his “judge a person by the content of character and not by color of skin”?
It seems some FReepers still judge by color of skin, a very collectivist thing to do. The MLK dream has a long way to go.
Here’s an essay on this. In stems from the believe that some people have (including me, a man from Alabama), that Dr. King never would have succeeded, and the Civil Rights struggle would not have been successful, if it wasn’t for the Southern White Church.
Long read, but apropos for today and tomorrow...
_______________________________________________________________
How Martin Luther King Jr. Overcame “Christian” White Supremacy
Why is civil rights no longer a “culture war” issue? Why were the voices of the civil rights pioneers persuasive, not only to mainstream America but to conservative Christians as well? Some might argue it is because the culture has changed. But the culture has changed just as much (if not more so) on the question of gender and sexual issues, after three waves of feminism and a sexual revolution, but not so for traditionalist Catholics and confessional Protestants.
The civil rights movement struggled on multiple fronts. In the political sphere, leaders such as King pointed out how the American system was inconsistent with Jeffersonian principles of the “self-evident” truth that “all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” Politically, Americans had to choose: be American (as defined in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence) or be white supremacist; you can’t be both. King and his compatriots were right.
But the civil rights movement was, at core, also an ecclesial movement. King was, after all, “Rev. King” and many of those marching with him, singing before him, listening to him, were Christian clergy and laity. To the churches, especially the churches of the South, the civil rights pioneers sent a similar message to the one they sent to the governmental powers. You have to choose: be a Christian (as defined by the Scripture and the small “c” catholic apostolic tradition) or be a white supremacist; you can’t be both. They were right here too.
How can white supremacy be true, they would argue, if humanity is made from “one blood” in the creation of Adam? How can one segregate evangelistic crusades if the cross of Christ atones for all people, both white and black? If God personally regenerates repentant sinners, both white and black, how can we see people in terms of “race” rather than in terms of the person? If we send missionaries across the seas to evangelize Africa, how is it not hypocrisy not to admit African-Americans into church membership?
The biblical power of the argument is true, regardless of whether all the civil rights pioneers, in the SBC and out of it, believed in biblical orthodoxy.
Many did. See the faithful heroine Fannie Lou Hamer of Sunflower County, Misssissippi, for example. If Baptists had a means of canonization, I’d support it for her. I still claim the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party as my partisan home, and I say expand the “freedom” to the unborn as well as the born, even though the party doesn’t exist anymore.
But regardless of personal faith, the civil rights heroes indicted conservative hypocrites, prophetically, with the conservatives’ own convictional claims. And, as Jesus promised, “My sheep hear my voice and they follow me.”
The arguments for racial reconciliation were persuasive, ultimately, to orthodox Christians because they appealed to a higher authority than the cultural captivity of white supremacy. These arguments appealed to the authority of Scripture and the historic Christian tradition.
This authority couldn’t easily be muted by a claim to a “different interpretation” because racial equality was built on premises conservatives already heartily endorsed: the universal love of God, the unity of the race in Adam, the Great Commission and the church as the household of God.
With this the case, the legitimacy of segregation crumbled just as the legitimacy of slavery had in the century before, and for precisely the same reasons. Segregation, like slavery, was shown to be what all human consciences already knew it to be: not just a political injustice or a social inequity (although certainly that) but also a sin against God and neighbor and a repudiation of the gospel. Regenerate hearts ultimately melted before such arguments because in them they heard the voice of their Christ, a voice they’d heard in the Scriptures themselves.
Thanks for the link. Interesting topic.
Those days seem so distant now. Sad we are still in turmoil instead of harmony after coming so far. So many people go on with a chip on their shoulder that only hurts them in the long run.
That won’t happen until we are in charge of all three branches, the govt. has been weaponized left.
Sounds like rosy is carrying brandons water or him how oculd he not be aware he had classified in his garage,unreal!
I watched ABC’s This Week where Jonathan Karl was the guest host. When Jonathan Karl asked Georgia Senator Warnock about why the white house delayed informing the public until January 2023 that classified documents were found at Biden’s former think tank, Warnock talked about other things like MLK. Karl didn’t react to Warnock’s refusal to answer the question. If he was interviewing a Republican Senator, I doubt Karl would have just accepted that behavior.
Also I noticed that This Week didn’t ask anybody about the procedure for moving “classified” documents out of a secured location. Who has the authority to move “classified” documents. Shouldn’t there be some sort of signup sheet that must be filled out when documents are moved? Republicans should seek answers to my questions.
thanks for this!
You got it that's what we are up against and its just as bad as lying or half truthing about us.They just ignore stuff that makes the hard left,and there is no one harder left than commie warlock,look bad. Best we can do is what you just did and keep pointing it out so they might think twice next time they pull this stunt.
We have achieved King’s dream. Now the woke mob seeks to tear it down. We have NOTHING to be ashamed of as a nation and as a people. The shame is we give those who hate us any credibility for their slanders and insults.
I used to actually transport highly classified but broken computer disk packs and magnetic tape from the DIA Center in Washington DC to NSA HQs at Fort Meade, Maryland.
NSA had an enormous shredder /pulverizer, which was the approved method for destroying classified material of this kind. Actually, we could burn magnetic tape with paper documents, but that was a stinky, dangerous job, so we just saved all our classified and drove it up to the “Smasher”.
Bureaucratly, it was a serious pain in the back end. At least two people had to go, we had to sign out each piece, and then we couldn’t take a single stop along the way. We had to call ahead to let them know our ETA. If we broke down, they’d come looking us (this was before cell phones and had the existed then (mid 80s) they would be illegal to bring in a SCIF). The van we used was considered to be SCIF worthy for the single purpose of transporting TOP Secret and above.
We weren’t armed, although I bitched to everyone that I should be.
Once there, we had to countersign with the NSA people for every item we brought and that each was officially destroyed.
BTW, I loved the Smasher. I could watch it destroy stuff for hours!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.