Or maybe you just want to ignore the factual number evidence Kiryandil presented to you so that you may continue to believe what you very greatly prefer to be the truth.
The real evidence shows fraud. Your opinions of Lake show that you just don't like her.
Kiryandil presented nothing. But even if he had, it would not be evidence, just conjecture.
You guys have trouble with understanding the rules of evidence. This is why you keep getting frustrated with courts. Making speculative conclusions from vote totals between different years is not evidence of anything. It’s just your unexpert opinion.
Lake presented literally no evidence or testimony of deliberate wrongdoing. Her own “expert witness” was destroyed by the county. I watched the entire thing. It was a complete failure by Lake. She’s ending her political future the longer she whines about this with no evidence of any kind.