Kiryandil presented nothing. But even if he had, it would not be evidence, just conjecture.
You guys have trouble with understanding the rules of evidence. This is why you keep getting frustrated with courts. Making speculative conclusions from vote totals between different years is not evidence of anything. It’s just your unexpert opinion.
Lake presented literally no evidence or testimony of deliberate wrongdoing. Her own “expert witness” was destroyed by the county. I watched the entire thing. It was a complete failure by Lake. She’s ending her political future the longer she whines about this with no evidence of any kind.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson ruled that Lake can go to trial Wednesday and Thursday with two of her 10 claims, which allege misconduct with ballot printers and problems with ballot chain of custody.
You can pretend it wasn't Calvinball - but it was Calvinball.
The big-city stooge-judges stooge for the puppeteers who appointed them.
You can also quit pretending that isn't true.
You seem to have an amusing detachment from the real world, and have substituted what the TeeVee is telling you about the Fake World it "reports" on as your reality.
When the vote-riggers switched from using a "Democrat-friendly county vote-pumping" scheme in 2016 to a brute-force IT solution in 2020, I would say that noticing that fact would come under my expert opinion, which is "database manager & programmer analyst".
You? Not so much. You're just some FR rando that disappears for three years at a time, then resurfaces with some "strong opinions" on stuff.
I'm analyzing that particular behavior, too, BTW. It's what I do - see "programmer analyst". 
