To: E. Pluribus Unum
I should have been more clear. I was talking about his DNA being on record due to him giving it to an ancestry site. At least I think that’s what the article was trying to say.
28 posted on
12/31/2022 12:05:55 PM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(The only way to secure your own future is to create it yourself.)
To: SaxxonWoods
Maybe, subconsciously, he wanted to get caught.
“Stop me before I kill again.”
But I know NUTHINGK!!! :)
30 posted on
12/31/2022 12:08:29 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
To: SaxxonWoods
Not him a family member did the DNA test
68 posted on
12/31/2022 5:29:54 PM PST by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
To: SaxxonWoods
“about his DNA being on record due to him giving it to an ancestry site. “
No, one of his cousins did a DNA test with an ancestry site. They matched the DNA at the crime scene as being a close family member of the ancestry person. Gives authorities a short list of persons
70 posted on
12/31/2022 7:48:59 PM PST by
campaignPete R-CT
(I owe, I owe, it's off to work I go ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson