Posted on 12/29/2022 7:00:21 AM PST by AT7Saluki
"The Republican Party of 1912 decided it would be better off renominating William Howard Taft, even though its voters would have preferred another Roosevelt term. The resulting split ushered in Woodrow Wilson and the first academic globalists, whose bright ideas laid the groundwork for a second world war on the eve of the conclusion of the first. ...
But, despite the obvious differences, we’re heading for a 1912-repeat, in which the Republican Party ignores its own voters. The Republican machine has no intention of letting us choose Trump again: He is not a uniparty team player. They’d rather lose an election to the Democrats, their brothers in crime, than win with Trump.
That leads us to the inevitable question: What should we do when a majority of Republicans want Trump, but the Republican Party says we can’t have him?"
(Excerpt) Read more at theamericantribune.com ...
I am. I am going to listen to the candidates and vote for the one who can make a better intellectual and moral case as to why he deserves to be elected and weigh that against their performance so far.
Trump isn’t celebrating faggotry. He’s against persecuting gays and so am I. I think maybe you are the one with the problems.
Who is persecuting gays?
well, while I don’t think they should be persecuted, I do think they should be permanently banned from working in schools ... like it used to be in saner times.
Nobody I know.
Go with him…into political oblivion. Then we get four more years of whomever is running stuff now.
And the cultists can squat in a cave like Gollum, longing for their “precious.”
Bump for Ronlims with reading comprehension
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.