Under Arizona law the proof had to be that there was intentional misconduct to deny her votes.
As long as people hinge their hopes on court cases, it keeps hope going, and it just delays what needs to be done. Stop hoping! Hope is not a strategy!
“Under Arizona law the proof had to be that there was intentional misconduct to deny her votes.”
Manipulating a printer to reduce or enlarge an image so that it cannot possibly be read by tabulators programmed for a specific size is intentional. If a judge doesn’t understand that, then he’s a stupid person.
That is an odd law. If machines are failing widespread, why would “intent’ factor in? What if the majority of the machines failed statewide and only 30% of the vote came in? I would assume that whoever is leading at that time wins if the law doesn’t allow a revote?