Posted on 12/24/2022 12:34:42 PM PST by TigerClaws
And Kati didn’t ?
Clearly we need the RNC out of our lives completely.
The short answer is incompetence.
Scott Johnson at Powerline had a friend (Local Arizona Attorney Jack Clifford) watch the proceedings and guest blog about them:
Day 1:
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/12/jack-clifford-lake-v-hobbs-day-1.php
Day 2:
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/12/jack-clifford-lake-v-hobbs-day-2.php
The short answer is that Hobbs proved Maricopa County is incompetent, but did not prove it incompetent enough to change the results, and did not prove fraud.
It was stolen…everybody knows it.
And don’t get me started on those Italian satellites.
Yup
Unable to provide proof of intentional misconduct sank her as expected. Election fraud is a crime and to date, no one has been charged.
You speak like a Linda Graham and Tim Scott Bootlicker. “SC” does stand for South Carolina, correct?
Either way, you speak like a Demonrat or RINO supporter. Real Americans should just shut up and politely look the other way at election stealing. That’s damnable and traitorous.
You probably accept Xiden as your president.
“Lake faced extremely long odds in her challenge, needing to prove not only that misconduct occurred, but also that it was intended to deny her victory and did in fact result in the wrong woman being declared the winner.”
So did Lake ever find the people who made the changes? If not, why not? It seems like her ability to win was predicated on proving this, based on what the law was.
Beside the fact that most of the judges are corrupt, and doing whatever the political winds tell them to do. Can you imagine what would happen to a judge who bucks the deep state.
Local court judges are not appointed by Presidents.🙄
Isn’t this a state\county judge?
WalkerinSC FR born-on date: 2021-09-16...
About time? Only if you’re in Chicago ;)
Hobbs knows the recall effort is coming so standby for the legislature to change the recall statute to prevent Lake’s attempt to have her recalled. Mark Elias is probably already writing the law to be passed on an expedited legislative session.
Opaque reply.
Can the judge define what he means by 'widespread misconduct'?????
Seems to me if only one vote was counted improperly that voter was disenfranchised and the vote count would be bogus!
For some odd reason, boomers and conservatives in general have trusted government even thru korea, vietnam, jfk assassination, iran contra, 9/11/Afghanistan, iraq war, bank bailouts, fbi, etc.
Well, no, that’s not what the judge said. The judge said that in the presence of problems, voters were given alternatives.
“The Court notes that Mr. Parikh also acknowledged a fact admitted by several of Plaintiff’s witnesses: that any ballot that could not be read due to BOD printer or tabulator failure could be submitted for ballot duplication and adjudication through Door 3 on the tabulators. Plaintiff’s own expert acknowledged that a ballot that was unable to be read at the vote center could be deposited by a voter, duplicated by a bipartisan board onto a readable ballot, and – in the final analysis – counted. Thus, Plaintiff’s expert on this point admitted that the voters who suffered from tabulator rejections would nevertheless have their votes counted. This, at a minimum, means that the actual impact element of Count II could not be proven. The BOD printer failures did not actually affect
the results of the election.” (page 6)
“It is worth repeating that ballots that could not be read by the tabulator immediately because of printer settings – or anything else – could be deposited in Door 3 of the tabulator and counted later after duplication by a bipartisan adjudication board.” (page 7)
Wow! Where’s my shocked face? When you’re dealing with fascist”judges” who believe they are God, Americans are always going to take it in the shorts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.