Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

If you can afford the toys, why not?

I do doubt he paid the NFA tax on the full auto stuff.


4 posted on 12/21/2022 9:38:01 PM PST by doorgunner69 (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: doorgunner69

Nor market value with the military offering surplus (under GAO rules) to PD’s at discounts to get them off their books.


9 posted on 12/21/2022 9:48:38 PM PST by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: doorgunner69

As an FFL/SOT he only has to pay the tax on Form 4 arms.
The article seems to claim he was dealing in Post-86 “Sample” arms which would not be (Unconstitutionally!) taxed.
The Fed Firearms Laws are almost too complex for an individual to fully understand and are constantly changing.
BATFE changes their “Rulings”, congress meddles, even Trump screwed up with his “Bump stock ban” EO.
I am sure there are very few here who really know the in’s and out’s of these allegations.


16 posted on 12/21/2022 10:01:04 PM PST by Ex gun maker. (Free thinking is now a radical concept, I will not be assimilated by PC or EV groupthink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson