As an FFL/SOT he only has to pay the tax on Form 4 arms.
The article seems to claim he was dealing in Post-86 “Sample” arms which would not be (Unconstitutionally!) taxed.
The Fed Firearms Laws are almost too complex for an individual to fully understand and are constantly changing.
BATFE changes their “Rulings”, congress meddles, even Trump screwed up with his “Bump stock ban” EO.
I am sure there are very few here who really know the in’s and out’s of these allegations.
And when has that EVER stopped FReepers from spouting off about ANYTHING? LOL!!
Merry Christmas