“Your technical description is not possible”
He’s right.
The cross-examining attorney is trying to make us believe that the witness is implying that the elections workers manning the printers somehow are, on-the-fly, selecting the “shrink to fit” option to skew results.
As far as I know, “shrink to fit” is managed in the computer, not the printer. So whomever is manning the computers/software, possibly or probably off site, are manipulating the printers to shoot out ballots that are unreadable by the tabulators.
The attorney asked the questions knowing that it would be impossible for the witness to answer.
Anyhow, that’s how I see it.
Worth clarifying that witness made it clear that the settings are set using scripts and can only be changed with password.
Someone can’t just accidentally nudge the printer and print off 1000s of bad ballots.
Nor could they have just pressed the wrong button to change settings: they had to use the admin password.