But the Log Cabin stuff pretty much screws up this theory. It now appears that Trump has no real strategy to get elected and that he’s just campaigning for the fun of it. (Which is believable. I always thought that Trump enjoyed running for president more than actually being president.)
@@@@@@@@@@@
There is always the possibility that POTUS sees all Americans as Americans first and hyphenated Americans second.
When standing on the Declaration and the Constitution all of us are created equal, with equal rights before God and Country. It is the overreach of “special” rights that upsets the Apple cart. POTUS still strives to ensure that our government “of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth”!
Let us not confuse lifestyles with rights and always respond with a gentle spirit and ask which rights a person of ________ belief is not enjoying in this great land of ours?
The fact that others may disagree with our beliefs, political views, or lifestyle choices does not negate our rights, it may hurt our FEELINGS, but we do not have a “Right” to live without having our beliefs, lifestyles, political views questioned or our feelings hurt.
I am sure the group in question would like safe streets, a secure border, an end to fentanyl trafficking, etc.
As a Christian I am compelled to pray for and witness to those who are lost without Christ that they may repent and be saved, not grind them under a boot heel. I often find myself in need of examining myself before God as to my spiritual condition and need for forgiveness as tempers can flare and less than loving remarks spew forth from an unbridled tongue.
Let us look at the whole picture of POTUS actions in the grand scheme of what must needs be done to deliver our nation from the evils we are seeing unfold at home and across the world. It is a long grind to 2024 and POTUS is forcing all into the open that we might see the fruit on their tree now versus later.
WWG1WGA!
One doesn’t help the country by endorsing sin. Of course we should respect alternate views and lifestyle choices as in tolerating the right of someone to choose them, but a leader shouldn’t mince words when it comes to supporting good moral choices. There are some so-called conservatives who now speak in support of “gay marriage” as a culturally good thing because it supposedly creates stable relationships.
My point? It is one thing to tolerate freedom to choose sin. It is something entirely different to call sin good. Consider abortion. I could respect the pro-choice position better if it spoke against the act and actually wanted to make abortion very rare. But the pro-aborts don’t really want to make abortion safe, legal and rare.
Do you see the distinction? By embracing the Log Cabin Republicans, is Trump merely supporting individual rights or is he promoting homosexuality as a moral choice?
Well said