Posted on 12/04/2022 9:03:04 AM PST by NetAddicted
As Twitchy readers (and Tucker Carlson viewers) know, James Woods was targeted by the Biden team for silencing and censorship during the 2020 election. So many of us were … and we get the feeling we are just seeing the tip of this corruption iceberg.
Woods is pissed, and rightfully so.
But wow, looking through his timeline? He’s taking NO prisoners and we’re here for it.
Thank you, @elonmusk, for giving back to all Americans, and voices around the world, the most precious of gifts – free and open speech.
I admire you and I salute you, sir.
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Keep going.
How is the Twitter Files chicanery any different from Watergate in sum and substance?
Nixon resigned when his henchmen tried to subvert free speech.
Your turn, Mr. Biden.
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Your turn, Mr. Biden.
Thousands of people reached out to Woods about being silenced.
I see it and I hear you. Thank you. https://t.co/wfJCaFGXQi
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
He’s so damn cool.
Seriously.
I humbly thank the thousands of you who offered such kind words of support tonight. I wish I could respond to each of you.
As heartbreaking as it is to see our nation highjacked by these grifters, it is equally heartwarming to see how many Americans still love this great nation.
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Damn right.
Agree. How would you like to fund a class action suit for those who were suppressed? I’ll be happy to be lead plaintiff. Thank you, @elonmusk https://t.co/zAAjcEnoFu
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
!!!
This. Must. Happen.
To my friends in the Democratic Party:
This now documented attack by the DNC is a troubling issue that transcends politics. If the shoe were on the other foot, you would rightfully be enraged. Please join us as Americans on this one. It’s too important to do otherwise. #Twitter
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Psh, Democrats are far more concerned with being in charge than they are with what happened on their watch. Orange man bad and stuff.
To my friends in the Republican Party:
If your patriotism is genuine, not all bluff and bluster, let loose the dogs of war.
Because true patriots will no longer stand to see our rights trampled by the DNC and its slimy cronies in media and the bowels of government. #Twitter
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR.
YAAAAAS.
I do see this, and I hear you. While I do not know you, I know your heart and share your sorrow. You are who I’m doing this for. Thank you for sharing what so many of us have felt during this never-ending purge. It is you, sir, who should be thanked, and I humbly do so. https://t.co/E5VW3hcDCH
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Awwwwwww.
For those of you who have not seen the primary material by @mtaibbi regarding the suppression collusion of the DNC and Twitter during the Biden campaign, here is the thread. #TwitterFiles https://t.co/I0Mmia8vil
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Just in case people missed it.
He’s a giver.
As of noon December 3. Clearly this is not going away. #TwitterFiles pic.twitter.com/IRKYw4OWWm
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
Not going away, Biden.
Not going away, Democrats.
I just noticed that I gained another 100,000 followers since @elonmusk saved Twitter from the suppressors of free speech. That’s 300,000 people in a few weeks, many of whose voices were silenced and are now free once again to enjoy the rights guaranteed by our constitution. 🙏
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
This.
Friends, I am a bit inundated by media requests at the moment.
Given the serious nature of the revelations coming from the president’s son’s laptop, I am reserving comment until my attorneys have fully evaluated the scope of the potentially actionable offenses. #TWITTERGATE
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022
“Finally, proof Twitter invented reason to help Joe Biden win in 2020” – New York Post Editorial Board
They suspended a newspaper founded by Alexander Hamilton, because the truth would have cost Biden the presidency. https://t.co/nPXHdYe3E5
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 4, 2022
BOOM.
Who would you trust more to deliver honest reportage of the news?
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 4, 2022
Guess who’s winning?
Hint, it ain’t the Corporate Media.
***
Related:
Ana Navarro learns the hard way NOT to throw rocks at ANYONE’S appearance from her large glass house
David French’s #TwitterFiles take SO embarrassingly bad even Elon Musk responds and OUCH
Tom Nichols claiming he’s a ‘certified political scientist’ trying to dunk on Elon Musk goes SO wrong
***
tags:2020 ELECTION, BIDEN, HUNTER BIDEN, JAMES WOODS, TWITTER, TWITTERFILES
********************************************************** trending (current Twitchy articles, which I find interesting) -------- Matt Taibbi’s reaction to corporate media trashing him over #TwitterFiles is quite simply PERFECTION -------- Miranda Devine ENDS smug NPR journo scoffing at Hunter Biden story in heated back and forth
Meaning you don’t know WTF you’re posting about.
If I'm censored on a private forum like Twitter or FR I'll live with it and decide if I want to keep posting there or at one of the other 100,000 available private sites.
No one is stopping anyone from speaking.
Did the framers think they each had the right to publish their speech in their neighbor's pamphlet? Regardless of what their neighbor wanted?
Or did they have the right to publish their own pamphlet?
That's not what happened to Woods and not what he's complaining about.
A private organization, the DNC, contacted another private organization, Twitter, and asked for content to be reviewed.
There was no government involvement and no 1st Amendment issue.
Does everyone have a "right" to post on FR, or is it only Twitter that the framers had in mind?
Well, considering what this thread is about, its probably fair to say that infiltration is just the beginning for FR. They are trying to deflate us, annoy us, anger us into doing something they can pin on us so they can shut FR down. Maybe we can ignore them and talk over them and talk to each other.
When I see that happening I'll agree with you.
Maybe you don’t have the right, as I see it, because I don’t like what you say. Should I contact the Moderator and have you silenced? That’s a serious question.
You think the government has the legal right to have the Robinsons delete accounts?
James Woods: Letting loose the Dogs of War .... I hope a lot of people join him ... masses of people.
I was never on Twitter, but I could still see his posts before they kicked him off & he was pretty hilarious at times and right on point. His phone interview with Tucker was good, if you haven’t heard it.
Wait a minute here.... would this be one of those conspiracies people (even here, believe it or not) tell me don’t happen?
Still here making a fool of yourself I see. Heh heh... some things never change. Well, take care.
Hey! Semimojo is this forum’s jester. You trying to move in?
Semi, you going to take this?
Here’s what progs are saying about govt Twitter cooperation.in 2020 Trump was POTUS not Biden. Is working in cahoots with DNC working with govt? It can be argued that it is not. The DNC is not a govt organization. It is defensible to see these joint operations and say they were not speech limitation by govt and therefore not a 1st Amendment violation. Of course the FBI participation raises other issues.
a) Biden was already selected leader of the Democrat party, and the Democrat party most definitely was part of the government.
b) Biden's campaign weren't the only Democrats coordinating with Twitter to suppress speech. There were sitting Democrat members of Congress involved as well.
"And in the data dump, it was said Trump as both a candidate and elected official did the same thing, only not as frequently."
Two wrongs don't make a right.
"Can you give me some examples of your claim?"
Here's one, Carpenter Vs. Scott (1983), US Supreme Court:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/463/825.html
"An alleged conspiracy to infringe First Amendment rights is not a violation of 1985(3) unless it is proved that the State is involved in the conspiracy..."
And here's a link to the relevant law, where you can note in section 3 that it specifically speaks to preventing "any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President", which would clearly seem to be the case here.
..how would you like to be censored?
Since FR doesn’t have a block button, i just go analog and skip anything written by that one.
That’s why I’m responding to you,. In my world, you exist.
That's up to you, and it's certainly your right to try.
It's also Jim's right to kick me off. This isn't complicated.
And BTW, kicking me off of FR won't silence me.
They can ask but they can compel.
The doesn't happen doesn't enter into it. Once they call it a conspiracy it is debunked and the story is a dead letter, happen or no happen, consequence or no consequence. It's a conspiracy theory. Full stop.
I’m amazed at what little attention is paid to the Twitter drop on this forum and it’s extremely important and I hope more continues to happen because this is crucial absolutely crucial the collusion of state security and tech oligarchs to influence the election is every bit as important as mail in voter fraud perhaps more so even because it’s such an abusive power
And Elon musk has the evidence
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.