Will Trump special prosecutor backfire on Democrats? Some think so, and here's why

Just the News ^ | November 23, 2022 - 12:10am | John Solomon

[USS Alaska]

im not sure many GOP need jock straps

Jock straps, G-Strings, same difference.

The pubbie congress critter females have bigger balls than most of the males.

SAD.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointee will have to probe what the FBI knew in advance of the Jan. 6 riot...

I think the author of the article really meant "should" instead of "will have to". And Dems and RINOs are not likely to be impressed by "should."

[COBOL2Java]

Very little backfires on the Democrats because they are currently the only team on the field competing. The GOP is still in the locker room trying to find their jock straps.

The GOP are the RAT team's water boys

[bitt]

p

[Tymesup]

While they can defund the SP, I’d be surprised if they did.

[Tymesup]

Speaking of Special Prosecutors, what’s junkyard dog John Durham up to these days?

[Political Junkie Too]

That's because Mueller himself was a figurehead lending his name for credibility. He was going senile and knew very little about what was going on in his name.

-PJ

[Political Junkie Too]

Is the left being set up for another Fitzmas?

-PJ

[AnthonySoprano]

.
This is the precise reasoning Sean Hannity used with Mueller - but Mueller just said - Not my purview, don’t know anything about it.

O’Reilly seems to think they are going to work as homest brokers to find the Truth.

Come on, O’Reilly’s reasoning doesn’t hold up even a little bit.

In Hillary’s case four of the Prime Witnesses’ interviews weren’t documented - as required - Barr and the whole lot said, doesn’t matter.

.