Posted on 11/07/2022 4:56:00 PM PST by McGruff
Lt. Gov. John Fetterman’s campaign for U.S. Senate has joined the legal fight over whether mail ballots with no date or the incorrect date should be counted in Tuesday’s election.
The Democratic campaign sued Pennsylvania elections officials Monday asking a federal judge to order that all mail ballots be counted regardless of what date, if any, voters wrote on the outside of the envelope.
State law requires that voters handwrite a date on the outer envelope when returning their mail ballots, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled last week that undated and wrongly dated mail ballots be set aside and not counted. The court issued a follow-up order Saturday setting specific date ranges that the handwritten dates must fall within.
(Excerpt) Read more at inquirer.com ...
Fetterman has figured a way to win his election.
It’s settled law. Latches.
https://newswithviews.com/federal-elections-end-at-midnight-on-election-day/
Foster v Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 is a 9-0 decision back in 1997 by the U.S. Supreme Court. They agreed to take up the issue of federal statutes vs state’s regarding election for federal offices and state election dates. The case that started it: MURPHY J. FOSTER, Jr., GOVERNOR OF LOUISIANA, et al., PETITIONERS v. G. SCOTT LOVE, PAUL S. BERGERON, KATHLEEN B. BALHOFF, and BENNIE BAKER-BOURGEOIS.
"It’s rare SCOTUS has a 9-0 decision and this one surprised me considering the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg was on the bench back then. You can read the transcript of the oral arguments in Foster v Love here.
Quoting Ginsberg: “It is an election, and it seems to me, being an election it conflicts with the Federal single Election Day.” It’s unfortunate this was not the key argument in Trump’s lawsuits although several of us tried to get him this information.
Constitutional attorney, Ren Jander’s November 18, 2020 piece, Elections Undecided by Midnight are Void & Preempted by Federal Law – Foster v Love (1997; 9-0 Decision) is a thorough examination of that case and federal statutes. Jander wrote, “Federal Election Day statutes were designed to curtail fraud, and to infuse a prima facie sense of integrity in our electoral process. But these States – in failing to obey Congressional deadlines – have flagrantly attempted to preempt federal law. This is certainly prohibited, and this is why the late election results are void.”
After a comprehensive analysis of the Constitution, federal and state statutes, Jander further writes: “Consider all of the above in light of the results of the 2020 presidential elections; in Pennsylvania today, two weeks after Election Day, 8000 votes suddenly appeared, and the initial count is still not complete; Arizona has tens of thousands of ballots left to count in the initial canvass; Georgia discovered over 2600 missing votes yesterday, and the entire State is conducting a recount; Wisconsin just announced the details and costs of a forthcoming recount; Michigan is buried in litigation supported by many sworn affidavits alleging irregularities. None of these states consummated their elections on November 3rd. The elections have failed, as a matter of law. The results should be voided.
“Reading Foster v. Love, together with the 9th Circuit’s analysis in Voting Integrity Project v. Keisling, we know that consummating an election before federal Election Day is prohibited, and that early voting is not prohibited, as long as the election is finally consummated on Election Day. If that be the case, then statutory construction makes it obvious that elections consummated after Election Day are preempted by the federal Election Day statutes.
“Any other construction would render the statutes inoperable. If “the election” – which is defined in Foster v. Love – as the combined acts of voters and officials – begins before Election Day, then continues after Election Day, there is no real Election Day. The statute would be utterly inefficient, and the plenary authority of Congress over the time to choose electors would be denied. There is no possible construction of the statute which would allow State elections for presidential electors to continue after Election Day.”
Many thousands of votes were “discovered” days after the November 2020 election. Counting of votes in key swing states extended well beyond Election Day when counting of the ballots had to stop at midnight ON Election Day.
On Nov. 5, 2020, Fox News reported, “The Postal Service failed to deliver 150,000 completed ballots to polling stations before Election Day, the Washington Post reported, including 12,000 in five of the states where the U.S. still eagerly awaits a final count.” Pennsylvania decided they would accept more ballot counting three days after Election Day as if the Foster v. Love Supreme Court decision didn’t exist.
We cannot allow that to happen for the upcoming mid-term elections. It’s up to the candidates and their supporters to make their county elections official in charge of elections aware federal elections must be consummated ON Election Day as so decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
For a thorough, comprehensive education on the Fed, the income tax, education, Medicare, SS, the critical, fraudulent ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment and more, be sure to order my book by calling 800-955-0116 or click the link, “Taking Politics Out of Solutions“. 400 pages of facts and solutions. Order two books and save $10.00
Who wants to bet a leftist judge will agree with this lawsuit?>>> The democrat supreme court in PA already ruled the balltos cannot be counted. Should be denied with prejudice. Barratry.
There will likely be tens of thousands of undated and wrongly dated ballots rejected statewide under that ruling.>>> Oh saw this actually there are probable a few hundred.
“asking a federal judge to order that all mail ballots be counted regardless of what date, if any, voters wrote on the outside of the envelope.“
Well of course they are, that’s how the cheaters roll
Fetterneck needs hundreds of thousands of phony ballots to win ...
Meter pegger
The Constitution clearly places voting rules in the hands of state legislators, not governors, not secretaries of state, not state courts, not the federal Department Of Justice, and not lower federal courts. Moore v Harper is on the SCOTUS docket, and should settle election rule fights once and forever.
Their federal challenge should have properly been an appeal from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to the US Supreme Court. But of course we know why they didn’t do that.
This should be (in part) an argument that they are at the wrong venue by the state in responding to this lawsuit.
agreed - because a Federal challenge to a state Supreme Court ruling should be an appeal to the US Supreme Court. This is trying to skirt the procedures...we know why, of course. But it should be thrown out immediately as you said.
No, they were successful in the suit that went to the PA Supreme Court.
I’m sure West Philly will have 130% turnout for Fetterman.
Insane.
And....make sure that all the ballots we have squirreled away in car trunks, and in suitcases under the ballot tables, are all counted (if necessary). Just ask AL Franken and SloJo Biden how it’s done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.