Posted on 11/05/2022 7:04:08 PM PDT by nwrep
Key points from Ralston analysis:
1. Republicans with much stronger trends than Dems in early voting.
2. WORST CASE SCENARIO FOR REPUBS: ---If both parties were to hold 90 percent of their bases and tie among indies, the Dem candidate would win 47.6-47.6 D+200 votes!
3. BEST CASE SCENARIO FOR REPUBS: ---If Repubs have a 5 percent base advantage and win indies by 10, it’s 50.1-44.9, GOP. 5.2 percent, Repubs.
Key quote: --It’s not out of the question that some of these races, including the top of the ticket ones, will be close at the end of Election Night. If anyone declares victory on Election Night, considering mail can come in for four days and be cured for six days, be suspicious. Both sides know what the law says – a law the Dems passed last year – so if anyone declares victory, that person is an election law denier. The count will not have stopped, and thousands of more ballots could be counted. Don’t forget that.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenevadaindependent.com ...
To add your name to the growing Nevada ping list, FReepmail me...
If I was a democrat...I would.
“ What planet are we living on?”
Full of common sense deniers
Close races will take extra days to count and will end up Dem wins.
Why in the world would thousands of ballots arrive after election day? I could see maybe a couple hundred.
I take offense from their misuse of English. No one denies elections. They can deny election results brought about by procedural abuses. They can deny the truthful outcome and usurp an office with a puppet Pretend-esident. They can deny the fact that a man who couldn't draw flies while not campaigning at all lost bigly to the man who consistently had to set up AV outside venues for the overflow crowds who couldn't get in.
The problem isn't with "election deniers" at all. It's with those who keep denying the truth and expect the rest of us to go along with their criminal deception. My tagline can straighten this out.
'Bout damned time our side did this.
I take offense from their misuse of English. No one denies elections.
Using their twisted language, are democrats FRAUD deniers?
i look at it as what part of election DAY dont they understand. any vote received AFTER midnight on election DAY should be disregarded PERIOD!!!
Its not just Nevada. Georgia fraud machine is in full swing.
So 30% less early voting this year compared to a Presidential election, which makes sense and allows us to extrapolate the only thing i look at, and that is turnout needed for democrats on election day ….
In other words, with the out of power party always more motivated on election day, we are sitting pretty if we turnout. They have zero early vote firewall. . .
Historically democrats win Nevada with a 30K plus early vote lead going into Presidential elections. The democrats know these numbers are a disaster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.