Paul ‘Jussie Smollett’ Pelosi – and Questions You Aren’t Allowed to Ask: Let's begin with the surveillance footage of the break-in. Where is it? Why can't we see it?

Let me be clear, I don’t give a damn about what happened to Paul Pelosi. It’s not that I want harm to come to the guy, I don’t want harm to come to almost anyone, but if the left is going to use his attack to smear me and my side of the political aisle, why the hell would I care about the person being used to facilitate it? The whole thing has a Jussie Smollett feel to it, to be honest, where everything “reported” fits perfectly into what Democrats need it to be and the truth, as is always the case with these people, isn’t even a consideration.

The second the story was reported came word the alleged attacker was asking “Where’s Nancy?” Democrats in the media immediately seized on that to tie it to Jan. 6th, because everything is Jan. 6th to them. But how would they have heard he said “Where’s Nancy?” If there were only 2 people there – Paul and the attacker – which one told police or reporters he was walking around saying that? Was it the man arrested for the attack or the guy with the multiple skull fractures who needed emergency surgery?

Most likely it was neither. At some point after Nov. 8th asking questions will become semi-legal again and the truth will come out. We’ll likely learn that never happened. Maybe it was just a couple of Nigerian brothers paid by check to do it, who knows? Nancy Smollett anyone?

What we do know is we aren’t allowed to ask questions, peons that we are, and the people with the job of asking questions and being skeptical of “official” stories are the ones insisting anyone doing what is literally their job is somehow a conspiracy theorist. Journalism was always pathetic, now it’s gotten worse.

There is, of course, a simple way Pelosi and her army of flying monkeys could put all of these rumors to bed (no pun intended…ok, maybe a little) and that would be to release the surveillance footage of the break in.

“What footage?” you may be asking. Well, the Pelosi’s are worth somewhere between $200 and $300 million, so there is no way they don’t have security cameras around their house. I’m not a multimillionaire and I have them, so there’s no way they don’t.

And she is Speaker of the House, third in line for the presidency of the United States. While she wasn’t home at the time, and therefore her security detail wasn’t there, it’s not likely they simply switched off all security measures they’d installed around the house for when they are there.

Where is the footage of the break-in? Personally, I want to know how someone can allegedly break a window from the outside and have all the glass laying around on the outside too. It’s great for clean-up, but a mystery of physics.

Also, why would that window be broken near a door with the same windows, but not break the window in the door instead? Especially when it’s a long reach to the handle for the door and unlikely the attacker climbed in through that broken window.

None of it makes any sense, but it could if they would simply release the security footage that undoubtedly must exist.

They haven’t, and may never. They also could release the 911 call or the police body camera footage, which probably exists too. Just know that conservatives are responsible and no evidence will be presented to back wild claims until after the election, and then only maybe. James Hodgkinson is looking up from hell laughing, and people who get their news from MSNBC are wondering how they know the name James Hodgkinson. Of course, none of them know Nicholas John Roske because attempting to murder Republicans or conservative Supreme Court Justices is barely a crime in Washington, DC, and not newsworthy to the left.

MSNBC had moved off the Hodgkinson story before Steve Scalice was off life support and barely bothered to cover Roske, likely disappointed that both failed.

So forgive me if I can’t bring myself to care about what happened when anyone asking questions about the event is shouted down as if they did it themselves. I’ve seen more anger about conservatives asking legitimate questions than I’ve seen directed toward the attacker. If this is going to be about politics, let us see the footage. Pelosi could easily make everyone asking any questions look foolish by simply releasing it. Seeing the attacker climb over the wall, smash the window and enter the house would answer almost every question. Why she hasn’t might be the biggest question of them all. Then again, maybe it’s not.

Pieces were smacked outward by a hand that tried to access the bolts inside the door but had to use a hammer to smack the broken windows out of the way.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There was an article posted here a few days ago where some of us got into a discussion about this. Much of your points fall into line with that. One suggestion I raised is that if the glass was broken from the outside, one could have used the claw on the hammer to pull parts outward when trying to enlarge the hole... this could explain why there is glass on the brickwork on the outside.

The hole itself is obviously too small for anyone to crawl through. Thus as you say, the hole could only be used for a person’s hand but if the person was to reach ‘bolts’ that were located at the top and bottom of the door, that’s not possible as the distance is too far to reach.

If this door really was broken into from the outside, I suspect that the bottom and top bolts could be opened only if they were part of a linkage system that was tied to the movement of the center handle. One of the better pictures showing the doors is at this link... https://www.bbc.com/news/63477452 The center doors are closed but the doors on the left are open (and I think it can be assumed that they are all identical). I think that one can use their imagination and see some of what looks like a bolting arrangement on the left door... it seems quite likely that the right door (in each pair as viewed from the outside) closes first and the left door overlaps the right door and is the one that bolts to the top and the bottom.

One other observation.... at the picture at the bbc link, it seems like the mullion that was behind the broken glass can be seen (barely) on the inside. This suggests that the glass itself was one piece and the mullions are just ‘fake’ as opposed to ones that would have effectively created four separate glasses as opposed to just one pane.

Hammered - stars the Pelosi’s and Jussie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMrZMfn6-8k
That looks like a My Pillow she is using.

I wonder who the real father of Nancy Pelosi’s kids is?

Rob Schneider
@RobSchneider
I just heard that over 50 former intelligence officers signed a letter saying the Pelosi gay hammer attack rumors have all the hallmarks of a Russian gay hammer attack disinformation campaign.

Rising serpent
Isn’t it amazing how the media hasn’t figured out the Jan 6 pipe bomber, the Supreme Court leaker, a single one of Epstein’s clients, the motive of the Las Vegas shooter, but they knew Paul Pelosi’s midnight visitor was MAGA even before both could put their underwear back on?

Catturd ™
@catturd2
Goodnight everyone - hope tonight you don’t get into a two person hammer fight at 2am, both wearing only your underwear. - because if you did, it’d only be the 2nd time it’s happened in recorded history.

.....
In Paul Pelosi car accident there was someone reported to be in the car with him. It was assumed to be a woman.
.....
I am 110% sure it was a guy just like Paul Pelosi latest gay rent a boy. I wonder how much Paul Pelosi paid the last gay boyfriend to go away and how much the latest one will get paid?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.