Posted on 11/01/2022 2:09:29 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Just days removed from the assault on Paul Pelosi, Donald Trump is throwing in his lot with the conspiracy caucus on what actually happened in the attack.
Trump was asked about the attack during an interview with conservative radio host Chris Stigall on Tuesday. To be clear, what follows from the former president is nonsense and officials have gone on the record to denounce conspiracy theories like this.
“It’s weird things going on in that household in the last couple of weeks,” Trump said. “You know, probably, you and I are better off not talking about it. The glass, it seems, was broken from the inside to the out and, you know, so, it wasn’t a break in, it was a break out.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Why haven’t the police released where David the intruder was injured?
Injuries in private areas?
“To be clear, what follows from the former president is nonsense”
To be clearer, what follows from the author is nonsense.
That’s journalism?!
The police appeared to arrive within a few minutes of the phone call allegedly made before the hammer attack from the bathroom. A sensible pair of questions:
(a) why come out of the bathroom if you were alone there, and if not alone, what explains that?
(b) do the SFPD always respond that fast to emergency calls from residences? Or were they parked nearby expecting a call?
Was he hammering in the morning? Was he hammering in the evening? Was he hammering with his brothers and his sisters, all over this land?
” why come out of the bathroom if you were alone there, and if not alone, what explains that?
(b) do the SFPD always respond that fast to emergency calls from residences? Or were they parked nearby expecting a call?”
So what do you assume the reason for this was?
As opposed to the MAGAs-did-it conspiracy caucus?
They have made their personal campaigns yours. All the while with no inkling you may disagree. 2 years on Trump said or Twitter said. Now they reap it baby.
Biggest wave ever. Local. State. Federal. If they want to evaluate why Dems lost, and place blame, look in the mirror media.
“That’s just off the top of my head. Please continue adding items that make no sense.”
19. Why have they not released the audio from the Pelosi 9-11 call.
... Rlly?
vibrating hammer?
DePape was seen by a witness - private security for another wealthy person on the block - walking along (fully clothed, wearing black) with a black knapsack. I think the security guard, who was obviously concerned by his appearance at that hour of the night, kept an eye on the Pelosi residence and was the one who called the police and probably entered the residence before they did (and thus could open the door).
It’s not clear that they were both in their underwear, although Pelosi certainly was. Personally, I think Pelosi (despite the disclaimers supposedly provided by DePape) did know him and was expecting him, or possibly didn’t know him but was expecting him (that is, he’d called out for a prostitute). There’s no other explanation for the total lack of even standard security other than that it was shut off.
Also, I think DePape had been in or around the house before, since he seemed to know exactly where to go. Possibly as a workman, possibly a deliveryman, or even as a landscaper, which seems to have been what he did for the honest part of his living.
How so? He made factual statements.
I think then he would have hire an Uber rather than having his ho walk across town.
If I had a hammer! By Pete Seeger?
Did he?
It’s weird things going on in that household in the last couple of weeks.
Sounds like one of the Pelosi’s ticked someone off big time and may not let up.
Third time a charm ???.
Sorry, CNN, but I’ve seen the photo of the glass on the outside patio.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No one is going to argue that there is broken glass on the outside of the house on the patio area. The question is basically this...does the evidence of the smashed glass fit better with a scenario of someone smashing the glass from the outside or from the inside?
Here are some observations with this and everyone else can chime in on what they see that I’ve missed….
I don’t believe that any pictures have been available that shows what this looks like on the inside but at the 1 min. 25 sec mark at this video, it shows the outside relatively clearly. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-pelosi-nancy-husband-attack-not-a-random-act-details/ Here are a few points with this…
- There are three sets of double doors… the two doors on the left are both wide open for some reason while the other two sets of doors are closed.
- The broken glass comes from the door on the left side of the two center doors. Even though the broken glass is from one of the center sets of doors, these doors are closed in the video.
- The hole in the glass is centered at about the same height as the door handle. The remaining glass that is both above and below the hole appears to be in a shattered condition that almost seems like it is granular in nature. Consistent with this are the particles of grass on the brickwork directly below the hole…. There are no large broken pieces of glass, it almost all seems to be granular.
- There seems to be more particles of glass on the brickwork on the right side of the hole than on the left side i.e. just below the door handle.
- The size of the hole is too small for anyone of any reasonable size to climb in or out and certainly not ‘Dave’.
- Based on the video at the link, it does not appear possible to tell if the window in the door consists of a single, double (or even triple) layer of glass.
- The other doors appear to have a horizontal dividing piece that is just slightly above the door handle… this is one of three dividing pieces that essentially creates 4 equally sized sections of glass for each door. That horizontal piece is missing for the door with the broken glass and is not on the brick outside. It might have been removed or is the inside out of view.
The shattered granular nature of the glass almost makes it seem like it is a tempered glass that shatters on impact similar to the windshield of a car. If this is the case, one can see a scenario where a hit from the outside would break it but it might all still be in one piece (like a car windshield after a crash). Once struck a few more times, a hole would open. If there is glass on the ground under the scenario of the person doing the damage is on the outside, it’s possible that once a small hole has opened up, the claw part of a hammer could be used to pull the shattered glass toward the outside in an effort to make a hole large enough that a hand could reach inside to undo the door lock.
On the other hand, it’s possible that the window was just smashed out from the inside but then that begs the question of what was the scenario that made that a reason for someone to do that? If a person was on the inside, wouldn’t he just use the door lock?
Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large. Cillizza hates Trump.
Honestly, this is the kind of stuff, Trump needs to stay away from. Just say, I am focusing on the problems of America and our future.....
The media baits him into chasing down empty rabbit holes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.