Tulsi Gabbard's Dem Decision Fuels Speculation She's Trump's VP Choice

Newsweek ^ | 10/12/22 | BY AILA SLISCO, AT 12:10 AM EDT

[DoodleBob]

Yup. Rudy was awful as the lead for Trump’s post-election legal team. The communists didn’t need to turn it up to 11 on him.

[Ancesthntr]

Few things would make me oppose Donald Trump. Nemon Tulsi Gabbard as his immediate successor is one of those things. She is no friend of our constitutional liberties, and at the very best she would be an uber-RINO. At worst, she is a WEF agent who will sacrifice this nation’s independence on the alter of internationalism. She will be a constant source of leaks and dissection. No. Just no!

[lewislynn]

She's a woman. She'll bring emotional baggage. If she was all you think she is she would still be a Democrat.

Maybe she can get a gig on Fox. Fox people love her.

Speaking of DeSantis Paul Ryan's endorsement of him was the kiss of death. DeSantis better shake that one away quick.

Paul Ryan is deep state to the core. Why would he endorse DeSantis HMMMM?

[LuxAerterna]

VP is a bridge WAY too far.

She MIGHT be okay for a sub-cabinet position, although I can’t really think of one that’s particularly suitable for her.

[SisterK]

uh
no no no

[Political Junkie Too]

I've withheld from posting on this topic until I could formulate my thoughts.

1. I think it's good for Tulsi Gabbard to reject the Democrat party.
2. I think more Democrats should follow Gabbard's lead. It would be proof that Gabbard has "gravitas," that is, political leadership abilities.
3. President Trump would never risk the MAGA movement to a "flash-in-the-pan" celebrity. First, he would suspect the LAAP-dog media's attempt to elevate her profile. Second, there was similar speculation when Sarah Palin had a pizza dinner with Donald Trump that went nowhere.
4. President Trump supports growing the Republican presence and will not elevate a recent convert to the level of his administration when there are many proven conservatives on the bench. I think he's learned that lesson, bigly.
5. I think President Trump knows that with only one term left, he has to use his coattails to entrench the next generation of up-and-coming conservatives into the "Deep State" of the next 20 years. He won't waste that opportunity on someone like Gabbard. That doesn't mean that he won't reach out to her, but he won't let her usurp an important role like the VP when he has so much more work to do to cement the future base.

-PJ

[TigersEye]

That is a nice pic of Padma Lakshmi. Here are some more

Got any of Tulsi Gabbard?

[Olog-hai]

What “tribes”?

[Jim Noble]

President Trump would never risk the MAGA movement to a "flash-in-the-pan" celebrity

He interviewed her for Secretary of State in November 2016.

[Graybeard58]

Liberalism has its roots in Europe

`````````````````````````````````

I believe true liberalism has biblical roots. Not the communist brand that takes my money at the point of a (figurative) gun and distributes it as government sees fit, keeping a large portion of the money for itself.

The liberalism that comes from the heart and prompts me to help those in need, without expecting recompense.

[Political Junkie Too]

That's not VP, but it is fifth in the line of succession.

-PJ

[Olog-hai]

Fake news from Axios.